mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-15 16:24:13 +08:00
ext4: fix undefined behavior in ext4_fill_flex_info()
Commit 503358ae01
("ext4: avoid divide by
zero when trying to mount a corrupted file system") fixes CVE-2009-4307
by performing a sanity check on s_log_groups_per_flex, since it can be
set to a bogus value by an attacker.
sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex = sbi->s_es->s_log_groups_per_flex;
groups_per_flex = 1 << sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex;
if (groups_per_flex < 2) { ... }
This patch fixes two potential issues in the previous commit.
1) The sanity check might only work on architectures like PowerPC.
On x86, 5 bits are used for the shifting amount. That means, given a
large s_log_groups_per_flex value like 36, groups_per_flex = 1 << 36
is essentially 1 << 4 = 16, rather than 0. This will bypass the check,
leaving s_log_groups_per_flex and groups_per_flex inconsistent.
2) The sanity check relies on undefined behavior, i.e., oversized shift.
A standard-confirming C compiler could rewrite the check in unexpected
ways. Consider the following equivalent form, assuming groups_per_flex
is unsigned for simplicity.
groups_per_flex = 1 << sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex;
if (groups_per_flex == 0 || groups_per_flex == 1) {
We compile the code snippet using Clang 3.0 and GCC 4.6. Clang will
completely optimize away the check groups_per_flex == 0, leaving the
patched code as vulnerable as the original. GCC keeps the check, but
there is no guarantee that future versions will do the same.
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
5f163cc759
commit
d50f2ab6f0
@ -2006,17 +2006,16 @@ static int ext4_fill_flex_info(struct super_block *sb)
|
||||
struct ext4_group_desc *gdp = NULL;
|
||||
ext4_group_t flex_group_count;
|
||||
ext4_group_t flex_group;
|
||||
int groups_per_flex = 0;
|
||||
unsigned int groups_per_flex = 0;
|
||||
size_t size;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex = sbi->s_es->s_log_groups_per_flex;
|
||||
groups_per_flex = 1 << sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex;
|
||||
|
||||
if (groups_per_flex < 2) {
|
||||
if (sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex < 1 || sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex > 31) {
|
||||
sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex = 0;
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
groups_per_flex = 1 << sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex;
|
||||
|
||||
/* We allocate both existing and potentially added groups */
|
||||
flex_group_count = ((sbi->s_groups_count + groups_per_flex - 1) +
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user