mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 12:28:41 +08:00
cifs: add support for flock
The flock system call locks the whole file rather than a byte range and so is currently emulated by various other file systems by simply sending a byte range lock for the whole file. Add flock handling for cifs.ko in similar way. xfstest generic/504 passes with this as well Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
be1bf978e5
commit
d0677992d2
@ -1219,6 +1219,7 @@ const struct file_operations cifs_file_ops = {
|
||||
.open = cifs_open,
|
||||
.release = cifs_close,
|
||||
.lock = cifs_lock,
|
||||
.flock = cifs_flock,
|
||||
.fsync = cifs_fsync,
|
||||
.flush = cifs_flush,
|
||||
.mmap = cifs_file_mmap,
|
||||
@ -1238,6 +1239,7 @@ const struct file_operations cifs_file_strict_ops = {
|
||||
.open = cifs_open,
|
||||
.release = cifs_close,
|
||||
.lock = cifs_lock,
|
||||
.flock = cifs_flock,
|
||||
.fsync = cifs_strict_fsync,
|
||||
.flush = cifs_flush,
|
||||
.mmap = cifs_file_strict_mmap,
|
||||
@ -1257,6 +1259,7 @@ const struct file_operations cifs_file_direct_ops = {
|
||||
.open = cifs_open,
|
||||
.release = cifs_close,
|
||||
.lock = cifs_lock,
|
||||
.flock = cifs_flock,
|
||||
.fsync = cifs_fsync,
|
||||
.flush = cifs_flush,
|
||||
.mmap = cifs_file_mmap,
|
||||
|
@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ extern ssize_t cifs_strict_readv(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to);
|
||||
extern ssize_t cifs_user_writev(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from);
|
||||
extern ssize_t cifs_direct_writev(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from);
|
||||
extern ssize_t cifs_strict_writev(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from);
|
||||
extern int cifs_flock(struct file *pfile, int cmd, struct file_lock *plock);
|
||||
extern int cifs_lock(struct file *, int, struct file_lock *);
|
||||
extern int cifs_fsync(struct file *, loff_t, loff_t, int);
|
||||
extern int cifs_strict_fsync(struct file *, loff_t, loff_t, int);
|
||||
|
@ -1681,7 +1681,7 @@ cifs_setlk(struct file *file, struct file_lock *flock, __u32 type,
|
||||
rc = server->ops->mand_unlock_range(cfile, flock, xid);
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
if (flock->fl_flags & FL_POSIX) {
|
||||
if ((flock->fl_flags & FL_POSIX) || (flock->fl_flags & FL_FLOCK)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If this is a request to remove all locks because we
|
||||
* are closing the file, it doesn't matter if the
|
||||
@ -1698,6 +1698,56 @@ out:
|
||||
return rc;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int cifs_flock(struct file *file, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int rc, xid;
|
||||
int lock = 0, unlock = 0;
|
||||
bool wait_flag = false;
|
||||
bool posix_lck = false;
|
||||
struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb;
|
||||
struct cifs_tcon *tcon;
|
||||
struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode;
|
||||
struct cifsFileInfo *cfile;
|
||||
__u16 netfid;
|
||||
__u32 type;
|
||||
|
||||
rc = -EACCES;
|
||||
xid = get_xid();
|
||||
|
||||
if (!(fl->fl_flags & FL_FLOCK))
|
||||
return -ENOLCK;
|
||||
|
||||
cfile = (struct cifsFileInfo *)file->private_data;
|
||||
tcon = tlink_tcon(cfile->tlink);
|
||||
|
||||
cifs_read_flock(fl, &type, &lock, &unlock, &wait_flag,
|
||||
tcon->ses->server);
|
||||
cifs_sb = CIFS_FILE_SB(file);
|
||||
netfid = cfile->fid.netfid;
|
||||
cinode = CIFS_I(file_inode(file));
|
||||
|
||||
if (cap_unix(tcon->ses) &&
|
||||
(CIFS_UNIX_FCNTL_CAP & le64_to_cpu(tcon->fsUnixInfo.Capability)) &&
|
||||
((cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NOPOSIXBRL) == 0))
|
||||
posix_lck = true;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!lock && !unlock) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* if no lock or unlock then nothing to do since we do not
|
||||
* know what it is
|
||||
*/
|
||||
free_xid(xid);
|
||||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rc = cifs_setlk(file, fl, type, wait_flag, posix_lck, lock, unlock,
|
||||
xid);
|
||||
free_xid(xid);
|
||||
return rc;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int cifs_lock(struct file *file, int cmd, struct file_lock *flock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int rc, xid;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user