x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling

NUMA distance table handling has the following problems.

* numa_reset_distance() uses numa_distance * sizeof(numa_distance[0])
  as the table size when it should be using the square of
  numa_distance.

* The same size miscalculation when allocation space for phys_dist in
  numa_emulation().

* In numa_emulation(), phys_dist must be reserved; otherwise, the new
  emulated distance table may overlap it.

Fix them and, while at it, take numa_distance_cnt resetting in
numa_reset_distance() out of the if block to simplify the code a bit.

David Rientjes reported incorrect handling of distance table during
emulation.

-tj: Edited out numa_alloc_distance() related changes which weren't
     necessary and rewrote patch description.

-v2: Ingo was unhappy with 80-column limit induced linebreaks.  Let
     lines run over 80-column.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
Yinghai Lu 2011-03-02 11:22:14 +01:00 committed by Tejun Heo
parent cc28989437
commit ce0033307f
2 changed files with 11 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -390,14 +390,12 @@ static void __init numa_nodemask_from_meminfo(nodemask_t *nodemask,
*/
void __init numa_reset_distance(void)
{
size_t size;
size_t size = numa_distance_cnt * numa_distance_cnt * sizeof(numa_distance[0]);
if (numa_distance_cnt) {
size = numa_distance_cnt * sizeof(numa_distance[0]);
if (numa_distance_cnt)
memblock_x86_free_range(__pa(numa_distance),
__pa(numa_distance) + size);
numa_distance_cnt = 0;
}
numa_distance_cnt = 0;
numa_distance = NULL;
}

View File

@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ void __init numa_emulation(struct numa_meminfo *numa_meminfo, int numa_dist_cnt)
static struct numa_meminfo pi __initdata;
const u64 max_addr = max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
u8 *phys_dist = NULL;
size_t phys_size = numa_dist_cnt * numa_dist_cnt * sizeof(phys_dist[0]);
int i, j, ret;
if (!emu_cmdline)
@ -336,21 +337,18 @@ void __init numa_emulation(struct numa_meminfo *numa_meminfo, int numa_dist_cnt)
goto no_emu;
}
/*
* Copy the original distance table. It's temporary so no need to
* reserve it.
*/
/* copy the physical distance table */
if (numa_dist_cnt) {
size_t size = numa_dist_cnt * sizeof(phys_dist[0]);
u64 phys;
phys = memblock_find_in_range(0,
(u64)max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT,
size, PAGE_SIZE);
phys_size, PAGE_SIZE);
if (phys == MEMBLOCK_ERROR) {
pr_warning("NUMA: Warning: can't allocate copy of distance table, disabling emulation\n");
goto no_emu;
}
memblock_x86_reserve_range(phys, phys + phys_size, "TMP NUMA DIST");
phys_dist = __va(phys);
for (i = 0; i < numa_dist_cnt; i++)
@ -398,6 +396,10 @@ void __init numa_emulation(struct numa_meminfo *numa_meminfo, int numa_dist_cnt)
numa_set_distance(i, j, dist);
}
}
/* free the copied physical distance table */
if (phys_dist)
memblock_x86_free_range(__pa(phys_dist), __pa(phys_dist) + phys_size);
return;
no_emu: