From ccaff3d56acc47c257a99b2807b7c78a9467cf09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yonghong Song Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 13:03:04 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix clang compilation errors llvm upstream patch ([1]) added to issue warning for code like void test() { int j = 0; for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) j++; return; } This triggered several errors in selftests/bpf build since compilation flag -Werror is used. ... test_lpm_map.c:212:15: error: variable 'n_matches' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable] size_t i, j, n_matches, n_matches_after_delete, n_nodes, n_lookups; ^ test_lpm_map.c:212:26: error: variable 'n_matches_after_delete' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable] size_t i, j, n_matches, n_matches_after_delete, n_nodes, n_lookups; ^ ... prog_tests/get_stack_raw_tp.c:32:15: error: variable 'cnt' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable] static __u64 cnt; ^ ... For test_lpm_map.c, 'n_matches'/'n_matches_after_delete' are changed to be volatile in order to silent the warning. I didn't remove these two declarations since they are referenced in a commented code which might be used by people in certain cases. For get_stack_raw_tp.c, the variable 'cnt' is removed. [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D122271 Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220325200304.2915588-1-yhs@fb.com --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_stack_raw_tp.c | 3 --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_stack_raw_tp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_stack_raw_tp.c index e834a01de16a..16048978a1ef 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_stack_raw_tp.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_stack_raw_tp.c @@ -29,11 +29,8 @@ static void get_stack_print_output(void *ctx, int cpu, void *data, __u32 size) */ struct get_stack_trace_t e; int i, num_stack; - static __u64 cnt; struct ksym *ks; - cnt++; - memset(&e, 0, sizeof(e)); memcpy(&e, data, size <= sizeof(e) ? size : sizeof(e)); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c index baa3e3ecae82..aa294612e0a7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c @@ -209,7 +209,8 @@ static void test_lpm_order(void) static void test_lpm_map(int keysize) { LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, opts, .map_flags = BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC); - size_t i, j, n_matches, n_matches_after_delete, n_nodes, n_lookups; + volatile size_t n_matches, n_matches_after_delete; + size_t i, j, n_nodes, n_lookups; struct tlpm_node *t, *list = NULL; struct bpf_lpm_trie_key *key; uint8_t *data, *value;