mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 20:48:49 +08:00
rcu: Remove redundant rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() from tiny RCU
Let's start assuming that something in the idle loop posts a callback, and scheduling-clock interrupt occurs: 1. The system is idle and stays that way, no runnable tasks. 2. Scheduling-clock interrupt occurs, rcu_check_callbacks() is called as result, which in turn calls rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle(). 3. rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() reports the CPU was interrupted from idle, which results in rcu_sched_qs() call, which does a raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ). 4. Upon return from interrupt, rcu_irq_exit() is invoked, which calls rcu_idle_enter_common(), which in turn calls rcu_sched_qs() again, which does another raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ). 5. The softirq happens shortly and invokes rcu_process_callbacks(), which invokes __rcu_process_callbacks(). 6. So now callbacks can be invoked. At least they can be if ->donetail has been updated. Which it will have been because rcu_sched_qs() invokes rcu_qsctr_help(). In the described scenario rcu_sched_qs() and raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ) get called twice in steps 3 and 4. This redundancy could be eliminated by removing rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() function. Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
734d168013
commit
ca9558a33f
@ -185,16 +185,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__rcu_is_watching);
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC) || defined(CONFIG_RCU_TRACE) */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Test whether the current CPU was interrupted from idle. Nested
|
||||
* interrupts don't count, we must be running at the first interrupt
|
||||
* level.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return rcu_dynticks_nesting <= 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Helper function for rcu_sched_qs() and rcu_bh_qs().
|
||||
* Also irqs are disabled to avoid confusion due to interrupt handlers
|
||||
@ -250,7 +240,7 @@ void rcu_bh_qs(void)
|
||||
void rcu_check_callbacks(int user)
|
||||
{
|
||||
RCU_TRACE(check_cpu_stalls());
|
||||
if (user || rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle())
|
||||
if (user)
|
||||
rcu_sched_qs();
|
||||
else if (!in_softirq())
|
||||
rcu_bh_qs();
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user