mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-02 08:34:20 +08:00
igb: Loopback functionality supports for i350 devices
This patch adds VMDq loopback pf support for i350 devices. The patch is necessary since the register that enabled loopback was moved and renamed from DTXSWC to TXSWC. Signed-off-by: "Akeem G. Abodunrin" <akeem.g.abodunrin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bed45a6ed5
commit
ca2e3e7ec9
@ -1580,14 +1580,31 @@ void igb_vmdq_set_anti_spoofing_pf(struct e1000_hw *hw, bool enable, int pf)
|
||||
**/
|
||||
void igb_vmdq_set_loopback_pf(struct e1000_hw *hw, bool enable)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u32 dtxswc = rd32(E1000_DTXSWC);
|
||||
u32 dtxswc;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (hw->mac.type) {
|
||||
case e1000_82576:
|
||||
dtxswc = rd32(E1000_DTXSWC);
|
||||
if (enable)
|
||||
dtxswc |= E1000_DTXSWC_VMDQ_LOOPBACK_EN;
|
||||
else
|
||||
dtxswc &= ~E1000_DTXSWC_VMDQ_LOOPBACK_EN;
|
||||
wr32(E1000_DTXSWC, dtxswc);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case e1000_i350:
|
||||
dtxswc = rd32(E1000_TXSWC);
|
||||
if (enable)
|
||||
dtxswc |= E1000_DTXSWC_VMDQ_LOOPBACK_EN;
|
||||
else
|
||||
dtxswc &= ~E1000_DTXSWC_VMDQ_LOOPBACK_EN;
|
||||
wr32(E1000_TXSWC, dtxswc);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
/* Currently no other hardware supports loopback */
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (enable)
|
||||
dtxswc |= E1000_DTXSWC_VMDQ_LOOPBACK_EN;
|
||||
else
|
||||
dtxswc &= ~E1000_DTXSWC_VMDQ_LOOPBACK_EN;
|
||||
|
||||
wr32(E1000_DTXSWC, dtxswc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
@ -318,6 +318,7 @@
|
||||
#define E1000_RPLOLR 0x05AF0 /* Replication Offload - RW */
|
||||
#define E1000_UTA 0x0A000 /* Unicast Table Array - RW */
|
||||
#define E1000_IOVTCL 0x05BBC /* IOV Control Register */
|
||||
#define E1000_TXSWC 0x05ACC /* Tx Switch Control */
|
||||
/* These act per VF so an array friendly macro is used */
|
||||
#define E1000_P2VMAILBOX(_n) (0x00C00 + (4 * (_n)))
|
||||
#define E1000_VMBMEM(_n) (0x00800 + (64 * (_n)))
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user