From c9201b4fec0d8ebac1399825353c7a266665cccd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 16:20:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: tests: print all values as decimal in messages for extent map tests Some error messages of the extent map tests print decimal values of start offsets and lengths, while other are oddly printing in hexadecimal, which is far less human friendly, specially taking into consideration that all the values are small and multiples of 4K, so it's a lot easier to read them as decimal values. Change the format specifiers to print as decimal instead. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/tests/extent-map-tests.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-map-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-map-tests.c index 024588d02551..1eb442ea89a5 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-map-tests.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-map-tests.c @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ static void free_extent_map_tree(struct extent_map_tree *em_tree) #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG if (refcount_read(&em->refs) != 1) { test_err( -"em leak: em (start 0x%llx len 0x%llx block_start 0x%llx block_len 0x%llx) refs %d", +"em leak: em (start %llu len %llu block_start %llu block_len %llu) refs %d", em->start, em->len, em->block_start, em->block_len, refcount_read(&em->refs)); @@ -277,12 +277,12 @@ static int __test_case_3(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, ret = btrfs_add_extent_mapping(fs_info, em_tree, &em, start, len); write_unlock(&em_tree->lock); if (ret) { - test_err("case3 [0x%llx 0x%llx): ret %d", + test_err("case3 [%llu %llu): ret %d", start, start + len, ret); goto out; } if (!em) { - test_err("case3 [0x%llx 0x%llx): no extent map returned", + test_err("case3 [%llu %llu): no extent map returned", start, start + len); ret = -ENOENT; goto out; @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static int __test_case_3(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, if (start < em->start || start + len > extent_map_end(em) || em->start != em->block_start || em->len != em->block_len) { test_err( -"case3 [0x%llx 0x%llx): ret %d em (start 0x%llx len 0x%llx block_start 0x%llx block_len 0x%llx)", +"case3 [%llu %llu): ret %d em (start %llu len %llu block_start %llu block_len %llu)", start, start + len, ret, em->start, em->len, em->block_start, em->block_len); ret = -EINVAL; @@ -401,19 +401,19 @@ static int __test_case_4(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, ret = btrfs_add_extent_mapping(fs_info, em_tree, &em, start, len); write_unlock(&em_tree->lock); if (ret) { - test_err("case4 [0x%llx 0x%llx): ret %d", + test_err("case4 [%llu %llu): ret %d", start, start + len, ret); goto out; } if (!em) { - test_err("case4 [0x%llx 0x%llx): no extent map returned", + test_err("case4 [%llu %llu): no extent map returned", start, start + len); ret = -ENOENT; goto out; } if (start < em->start || start + len > extent_map_end(em)) { test_err( -"case4 [0x%llx 0x%llx): ret %d, added wrong em (start 0x%llx len 0x%llx block_start 0x%llx block_len 0x%llx)", +"case4 [%llu %llu): ret %d, added wrong em (start %llu len %llu block_start %llu block_len %llu)", start, start + len, ret, em->start, em->len, em->block_start, em->block_len); ret = -EINVAL;