mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-20 09:34:44 +08:00
KVM: x86/mmu: Check for !leaf=>leaf, not PFN change, in TDP MMU SP removal
Look for a !leaf=>leaf conversion instead of a PFN change when checking if a SPTE change removed a TDP MMU shadow page. Convert the PFN check into a WARN, as KVM should never change the PFN of a shadow page (except when its being zapped or replaced). From a purely theoretical perspective, it's not illegal to replace a SP with a hugepage pointing at the same PFN. In practice, it's impossible as that would require mapping guest memory overtop a kernel-allocated SP. Either way, the check is odd. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com> Message-Id: <20220226001546.360188-8-seanjc@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
614f6970aa
commit
c8e5a0d0e9
@ -491,9 +491,12 @@ static void __handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Recursively handle child PTs if the change removed a subtree from
|
||||
* the paging structure.
|
||||
* the paging structure. Note the WARN on the PFN changing without the
|
||||
* SPTE being converted to a hugepage (leaf) or being zapped. Shadow
|
||||
* pages are kernel allocations and should never be migrated.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (was_present && !was_leaf && (pfn_changed || !is_present))
|
||||
if (was_present && !was_leaf &&
|
||||
(is_leaf || !is_present || WARN_ON_ONCE(pfn_changed)))
|
||||
handle_removed_pt(kvm, spte_to_child_pt(old_spte, level), shared);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user