mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-05 01:54:09 +08:00
netfilter: nf_tables: move base hook annotation to init helper
coverity scanner says: 2187 if (nft_is_base_chain(chain)) { vvv CID 1505166: Memory - corruptions (UNINIT) vvv Using uninitialized value "basechain". 2188 basechain->ops.hook_ops_type = NF_HOOK_OP_NF_TABLES; ... I don't see how nft_is_base_chain() can evaluate to true while basechain pointer is garbage. However, it seems better to place the NF_HOOK_OP_NF_TABLES annotation in nft_basechain_hook_init() instead. Reported-by: coverity-bot <keescook+coverity-bot@chromium.org> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1505166 ("Memory - corruptions") Fixes: 65b8b7bfc5284f ("netfilter: annotate nf_tables base hook ops") Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d4fb1f954f
commit
c5c6accd7b
@ -1997,11 +1997,12 @@ static void nft_basechain_hook_init(struct nf_hook_ops *ops, u8 family,
|
||||
const struct nft_chain_hook *hook,
|
||||
struct nft_chain *chain)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ops->pf = family;
|
||||
ops->hooknum = hook->num;
|
||||
ops->priority = hook->priority;
|
||||
ops->priv = chain;
|
||||
ops->hook = hook->type->hooks[ops->hooknum];
|
||||
ops->pf = family;
|
||||
ops->hooknum = hook->num;
|
||||
ops->priority = hook->priority;
|
||||
ops->priv = chain;
|
||||
ops->hook = hook->type->hooks[ops->hooknum];
|
||||
ops->hook_ops_type = NF_HOOK_OP_NF_TABLES;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int nft_basechain_init(struct nft_base_chain *basechain, u8 family,
|
||||
@ -2168,10 +2169,8 @@ static int nf_tables_addchain(struct nft_ctx *ctx, u8 family, u8 genmask,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
nft_trans_chain_policy(trans) = NFT_CHAIN_POLICY_UNSET;
|
||||
if (nft_is_base_chain(chain)) {
|
||||
basechain->ops.hook_ops_type = NF_HOOK_OP_NF_TABLES;
|
||||
if (nft_is_base_chain(chain))
|
||||
nft_trans_chain_policy(trans) = policy;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
err = nft_chain_add(table, chain);
|
||||
if (err < 0) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user