mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 04:18:39 +08:00
PCI: Clean up pci_scan_slot()
While determining the next PCI function is factored out of pci_scan_slot() into next_fn(), the former still handles the first function as a special case, which duplicates the code from the scan loop. Furthermore the non-ARI branch of next_fn() is generally hard to understand and especially the check for multifunction devices is hidden in the handling of NULL devices for non-contiguous multifunction. It also signals that no further functions need to be scanned by returning 0 via wraparound and this is a valid function number. Improve upon this by transforming the conditions in next_fn() to be easier to understand. By changing next_fn() to return -ENODEV instead of 0 when there is no next function we can then handle the initial function inside the loop and deduplicate the shared handling. This also makes it more explicit that only function 0 must exist. No functional change is intended. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220628143100.3228092-2-schnelle@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f2906aa863
commit
c3df83e01a
@ -2579,8 +2579,7 @@ struct pci_dev *pci_scan_single_device(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_scan_single_device);
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned int next_fn(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev,
|
||||
unsigned int fn)
|
||||
static int next_fn(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev, int fn)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int pos;
|
||||
u16 cap = 0;
|
||||
@ -2588,24 +2587,26 @@ static unsigned int next_fn(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev,
|
||||
|
||||
if (pci_ari_enabled(bus)) {
|
||||
if (!dev)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
pos = pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ARI);
|
||||
if (!pos)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
|
||||
pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_ARI_CAP, &cap);
|
||||
next_fn = PCI_ARI_CAP_NFN(cap);
|
||||
if (next_fn <= fn)
|
||||
return 0; /* protect against malformed list */
|
||||
return -ENODEV; /* protect against malformed list */
|
||||
|
||||
return next_fn;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* dev may be NULL for non-contiguous multifunction devices */
|
||||
if (!dev || dev->multifunction)
|
||||
return (fn + 1) % 8;
|
||||
if (fn >= 7)
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
/* only multifunction devices may have more functions */
|
||||
if (dev && !dev->multifunction)
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return fn + 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int only_one_child(struct pci_bus *bus)
|
||||
@ -2643,26 +2644,25 @@ static int only_one_child(struct pci_bus *bus)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int pci_scan_slot(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int fn, nr = 0;
|
||||
struct pci_dev *dev;
|
||||
int fn = 0, nr = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (only_one_child(bus) && (devfn > 0))
|
||||
return 0; /* Already scanned the entire slot */
|
||||
|
||||
dev = pci_scan_single_device(bus, devfn);
|
||||
if (!dev)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (!pci_dev_is_added(dev))
|
||||
nr++;
|
||||
|
||||
for (fn = next_fn(bus, dev, 0); fn > 0; fn = next_fn(bus, dev, fn)) {
|
||||
do {
|
||||
dev = pci_scan_single_device(bus, devfn + fn);
|
||||
if (dev) {
|
||||
if (!pci_dev_is_added(dev))
|
||||
nr++;
|
||||
dev->multifunction = 1;
|
||||
if (fn > 0)
|
||||
dev->multifunction = 1;
|
||||
} else if (fn == 0) {
|
||||
/* function 0 is required */
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
fn = next_fn(bus, dev, fn);
|
||||
} while (fn >= 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Only one slot has PCIe device */
|
||||
if (bus->self && nr)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user