mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-16 08:44:21 +08:00
ARM: 7208/1: Add condition code checking to SWP emulation handler.
This patch fixes two separate issues with the SWP emulation handler: 1: Certain processors implementing ARMv7-A can (legally) take an undef exception even when the condition code would have meant that the instruction should not have been executed. 2: Opcodes with all flags set (condition code = 0xf) have been reused in recent, and not-so-recent, versions of the ARM architecture to implement unconditional extensions to the instruction set. The existing code would still have processed any undefs triggered by executing an opcode with such a value. This patch uses the new generic ARM instruction set condition code checks to implement proper handling of these situations. Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e7f626db83
commit
c245dcd326
@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
|
||||
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include <asm/opcodes.h>
|
||||
#include <asm/traps.h>
|
||||
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -185,6 +186,21 @@ static int swp_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int instr)
|
||||
|
||||
perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_EMULATION_FAULTS, 1, regs, regs->ARM_pc);
|
||||
|
||||
res = arm_check_condition(instr, regs->ARM_cpsr);
|
||||
switch (res) {
|
||||
case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL:
|
||||
/* Condition failed - return to next instruction */
|
||||
regs->ARM_pc += 4;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND:
|
||||
/* If unconditional encoding - not a SWP, undef */
|
||||
return -EFAULT;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (current->pid != previous_pid) {
|
||||
pr_debug("\"%s\" (%ld) uses deprecated SWP{B} instruction\n",
|
||||
current->comm, (unsigned long)current->pid);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user