mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 04:18:39 +08:00
mm: fix crashes from deferred split racing folio migration
Even on 6.10-rc6, I've been seeing elusive "Bad page state"s (often on flags when freeing, yet the flags shown are not bad: PG_locked had been set and cleared??), and VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) == 0)s from deferred_split_scan()'s folio_put(), and a variety of other BUG and WARN symptoms implying double free by deferred split and large folio migration. 6.7 commit9bcef5973e
("mm: memcg: fix split queue list crash when large folio migration") was right to fix the memcg-dependent locking broken in85ce2c517a
("memcontrol: only transfer the memcg data for migration"), but missed a subtlety of deferred_split_scan(): it moves folios to its own local list to work on them without split_queue_lock, during which time folio->_deferred_list is not empty, but even the "right" lock does nothing to secure the folio and the list it is on. Fortunately, deferred_split_scan() is careful to use folio_try_get(): so folio_migrate_mapping() can avoid the race by folio_undo_large_rmappable() while the old folio's reference count is temporarily frozen to 0 - adding such a freeze in the !mapping case too (originally, folio lock and unmapping and no swap cache left an anon folio unreachable, so no freezing was needed there: but the deferred split queue offers a way to reach it). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/29c83d1a-11ca-b6c9-f92e-6ccb322af510@google.com Fixes:9bcef5973e
("mm: memcg: fix split queue list crash when large folio migration") Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2fe29fe945
commit
be9581ea8c
@ -7823,17 +7823,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_migrate(struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Transfer the charge and the css ref */
|
||||
commit_charge(new, memcg);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the old folio is a large folio and is in the split queue, it needs
|
||||
* to be removed from the split queue now, in case getting an incorrect
|
||||
* split queue in destroy_large_folio() after the memcg of the old folio
|
||||
* is cleared.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In addition, the old folio is about to be freed after migration, so
|
||||
* removing from the split queue a bit earlier seems reasonable.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (folio_test_large(old) && folio_test_large_rmappable(old))
|
||||
folio_undo_large_rmappable(old);
|
||||
old->memcg_data = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
13
mm/migrate.c
13
mm/migrate.c
@ -415,6 +415,15 @@ int folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
|
||||
if (folio_ref_count(folio) != expected_count)
|
||||
return -EAGAIN;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Take off deferred split queue while frozen and memcg set */
|
||||
if (folio_test_large(folio) &&
|
||||
folio_test_large_rmappable(folio)) {
|
||||
if (!folio_ref_freeze(folio, expected_count))
|
||||
return -EAGAIN;
|
||||
folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio);
|
||||
folio_ref_unfreeze(folio, expected_count);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* No turning back from here */
|
||||
newfolio->index = folio->index;
|
||||
newfolio->mapping = folio->mapping;
|
||||
@ -433,6 +442,10 @@ int folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
|
||||
return -EAGAIN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Take off deferred split queue while frozen and memcg set */
|
||||
if (folio_test_large(folio) && folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
|
||||
folio_undo_large_rmappable(folio);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Now we know that no one else is looking at the folio:
|
||||
* no turning back from here.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user