mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 12:28:41 +08:00
mm/compaction: change the timing to check to drop the spinlock
It is odd to drop the spinlock when we scan (SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX - 1) th pfn page. This may results in below situation while isolating migratepage. 1. try isolate 0x0 ~ 0x200 pfn pages. 2. When low_pfn is 0x1ff, ((low_pfn+1) % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) == 0, so drop the spinlock. 3. Then, to complete isolating, retry to aquire the lock. I think that it is better to use SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX th pfn for checking the criteria about dropping the lock. This has no harm 0x0 pfn, because, at this time, locked variable would be false. Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
01ead5340b
commit
be1aa03b97
@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
for (; low_pfn < end_pfn; low_pfn++) {
|
||||
/* give a chance to irqs before checking need_resched() */
|
||||
if (locked && !((low_pfn+1) % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)) {
|
||||
if (locked && !(low_pfn % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)) {
|
||||
if (should_release_lock(&zone->lru_lock)) {
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
|
||||
locked = false;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user