mfd: twl6030: Make twl6030_exit_irq() return void

This function returns 0 unconditionally, so there is no benefit in
returning a value at all and make the caller do error checking.

Also the caller (twl_remove()) cannot do anything sensible with an error
code. Passing it up the call stack isn't a good option because the i2c core
ignores error codes (apart from emitting an error message).

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220113101430.12869-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
This commit is contained in:
Uwe Kleine-König 2022-01-13 11:14:29 +01:00 committed by Lee Jones
parent 380422ad34
commit b6f2943182
3 changed files with 4 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -1036,12 +1036,12 @@ static void clocks_init(struct device *dev,
static int twl_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
{
unsigned i, num_slaves;
int status;
int status = 0;
if (twl_class_is_4030())
status = twl4030_exit_irq();
else
status = twl6030_exit_irq();
twl6030_exit_irq();
if (status < 0)
return status;

View File

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
#define __TWL_CORE_H__
extern int twl6030_init_irq(struct device *dev, int irq_num);
extern int twl6030_exit_irq(void);
extern void twl6030_exit_irq(void);
extern int twl4030_init_irq(struct device *dev, int irq_num);
extern int twl4030_exit_irq(void);
extern int twl4030_init_chip_irq(const char *chip);

View File

@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ fail_irq:
return status;
}
int twl6030_exit_irq(void)
void twl6030_exit_irq(void)
{
if (twl6030_irq && twl6030_irq->twl_irq) {
unregister_pm_notifier(&twl6030_irq->pm_nb);
@ -453,6 +453,5 @@ int twl6030_exit_irq(void)
* in this module.
*/
}
return 0;
}