mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-26 13:44:15 +08:00
rcu: Do a single rhp->func read in rcu_head_after_call_rcu()
The rcu_head_after_call_rcu() function reads the rhp->func pointer twice, which can result in a false-positive WARN_ON_ONCE() if the callback were passed to call_rcu() between the two reads. Although racing rcu_head_after_call_rcu() with call_rcu() is to be a dubious use case (the return value is not reliable in that case), intermittent and irreproducible warnings are also quite dubious. This commit therefore uses a single READ_ONCE() to pick up the value of rhp->func once, then tests that value twice, thus guaranteeing consistent processing within rcu_head_after_call_rcu()(). Neverthless, racing rcu_head_after_call_rcu() with call_rcu() is still a dubious use case. Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org> [ paulmck: Add blank line after declaration per checkpatch.pl. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6973032a60
commit
b699cce160
@ -878,9 +878,11 @@ static inline void rcu_head_init(struct rcu_head *rhp)
|
||||
static inline bool
|
||||
rcu_head_after_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t f)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (READ_ONCE(rhp->func) == f)
|
||||
rcu_callback_t func = READ_ONCE(rhp->func);
|
||||
|
||||
if (func == f)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(READ_ONCE(rhp->func) != (rcu_callback_t)~0L);
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(func != (rcu_callback_t)~0L);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user