btrfs: abort transaction when sibling keys check fails for leaves

[ Upstream commit 9ae5afd02a ]

If the sibling keys check fails before we move keys from one sibling
leaf to another, we are not aborting the transaction - we leave that to
some higher level caller of btrfs_search_slot() (or anything else that
uses it to insert items into a b+tree).

This means that the transaction abort will provide a stack trace that
omits the b+tree modification call chain. So change this to immediately
abort the transaction and therefore get a more useful stack trace that
shows us the call chain in the bt+tree modification code.

It's also important to immediately abort the transaction just in case
some higher level caller is not doing it, as this indicates a very
serious corruption and we should stop the possibility of doing further
damage.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Filipe Manana 2023-04-26 11:51:35 +01:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 872a038dd4
commit af739a7015

View File

@ -2907,6 +2907,7 @@ static int push_leaf_right(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root
if (check_sibling_keys(left, right)) {
ret = -EUCLEAN;
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
btrfs_tree_unlock(right);
free_extent_buffer(right);
return ret;
@ -3150,6 +3151,7 @@ static int push_leaf_left(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root
if (check_sibling_keys(left, right)) {
ret = -EUCLEAN;
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
goto out;
}
return __push_leaf_left(path, min_data_size,