mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 04:18:39 +08:00
kunit: fix assert_type for comparison macros
When replacing KUNIT_BINARY_*_MSG_ASSERTION() macros with
KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(), the assert_type parameter was not always
correctly transferred. Specifically, the following errors were
introduced:
- KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG() uses KUNIT_ASSERTION
- KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG() uses KUNIT_EXPECTATION
- KUNIT_ASSERT_GT_MSG() uses KUNIT_EXPECTATION
A failing KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG() test thus prevents further tests from
running, while failing KUNIT_ASSERT_{LT,GT}_MSG() tests do not prevent
further tests from running. This is contrary to the documentation,
which states that failing KUNIT_EXPECT_* macros allow further tests to
run, while failing KUNIT_ASSERT_* macros should prevent this.
Revert the KUNIT_{ASSERTION,EXPECTATION} switches to fix the behaviour
for the affected macros.
Fixes: 40f39777ce
("kunit: decrease macro layering for integer asserts")
Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
41a55567b9
commit
aded3cad90
@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ do { \
|
||||
|
||||
#define KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \
|
||||
KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \
|
||||
KUNIT_ASSERTION, \
|
||||
KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \
|
||||
left, <=, right, \
|
||||
fmt, \
|
||||
##__VA_ARGS__)
|
||||
@ -1116,7 +1116,7 @@ do { \
|
||||
|
||||
#define KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \
|
||||
KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \
|
||||
KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \
|
||||
KUNIT_ASSERTION, \
|
||||
left, <, right, \
|
||||
fmt, \
|
||||
##__VA_ARGS__)
|
||||
@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ do { \
|
||||
|
||||
#define KUNIT_ASSERT_GT_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \
|
||||
KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \
|
||||
KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \
|
||||
KUNIT_ASSERTION, \
|
||||
left, >, right, \
|
||||
fmt, \
|
||||
##__VA_ARGS__)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user