mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 12:28:41 +08:00
RDMA/mlx5: Prevent prefetch from racing with implicit destruction
Prefetch work in mlx5_ib_prefetch_mr_work can be queued and able to run
concurrently with destruction of the implicit MR. The num_deferred_work
was intended to serialize this, but there is a race:
CPU0 CPU1
mlx5_ib_free_implicit_mr()
xa_erase(odp_mkeys)
synchronize_srcu()
__xa_erase(implicit_children)
mlx5_ib_prefetch_mr_work()
pagefault_mr()
pagefault_implicit_mr()
implicit_get_child_mr()
xa_cmpxchg()
atomic_dec_and_test(num_deferred_mr)
wait_event(imr->q_deferred_work)
ib_umem_odp_release(odp_imr)
kfree(odp_imr)
At this point in mlx5_ib_free_implicit_mr() the implicit_children list is
supposed to be empty forever so that destroy_unused_implicit_child_mr()
and related are not and will not be running.
Since it is not empty the destroy_unused_implicit_child_mr() flow ends up
touching deallocated memory as mlx5_ib_free_implicit_mr() already tore down the
imr parent.
The solution is to flush out the prefetch wq by driving num_deferred_work
to zero after creation of new prefetch work is blocked.
Fixes: 5256edcb98
("RDMA/mlx5: Rework implicit ODP destroy")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200719065435.130722-1-leon@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
87c4c774cb
commit
a862192e92
@ -601,6 +601,23 @@ void mlx5_ib_free_implicit_mr(struct mlx5_ib_mr *imr)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
synchronize_srcu(&dev->odp_srcu);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* All work on the prefetch list must be completed, xa_erase() prevented
|
||||
* new work from being created.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
wait_event(imr->q_deferred_work, !atomic_read(&imr->num_deferred_work));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* At this point it is forbidden for any other thread to enter
|
||||
* pagefault_mr() on this imr. It is already forbidden to call
|
||||
* pagefault_mr() on an implicit child. Due to this additions to
|
||||
* implicit_children are prevented.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Block destroy_unused_implicit_child_mr() from incrementing
|
||||
* num_deferred_work.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
xa_lock(&imr->implicit_children);
|
||||
xa_for_each (&imr->implicit_children, idx, mtt) {
|
||||
__xa_erase(&imr->implicit_children, idx);
|
||||
@ -609,9 +626,8 @@ void mlx5_ib_free_implicit_mr(struct mlx5_ib_mr *imr)
|
||||
xa_unlock(&imr->implicit_children);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* num_deferred_work can only be incremented inside the odp_srcu, or
|
||||
* under xa_lock while the child is in the xarray. Thus at this point
|
||||
* it is only decreasing, and all work holding it is now on the wq.
|
||||
* Wait for any concurrent destroy_unused_implicit_child_mr() to
|
||||
* complete.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
wait_event(imr->q_deferred_work, !atomic_read(&imr->num_deferred_work));
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user