mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 21:38:32 +08:00
rcu: Make offline-CPU checking allow for indefinite delays
The rcu_implicit_offline_qs() function implicitly assumed that execution would progress predictably when interrupts are disabled, which is of course not guaranteed when running on a hypervisor. Furthermore, this function is short, and is called from one place only in a short function. This commit therefore ensures that the timing is checked before checking the condition, which guarantees correct behavior even given indefinite delays. It also inlines rcu_implicit_offline_qs() into rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(). Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5cc900cf55
commit
a82dcc7602
@ -318,35 +318,6 @@ static struct rcu_node *rcu_get_root(struct rcu_state *rsp)
|
||||
return &rsp->node[0];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the specified CPU is offline, tell the caller that it is in
|
||||
* a quiescent state. Otherwise, whack it with a reschedule IPI.
|
||||
* Grace periods can end up waiting on an offline CPU when that
|
||||
* CPU is in the process of coming online -- it will be added to the
|
||||
* rcu_node bitmasks before it actually makes it online. The same thing
|
||||
* can happen while a CPU is in the process of coming online. Because this
|
||||
* race is quite rare, we check for it after detecting that the grace
|
||||
* period has been delayed rather than checking each and every CPU
|
||||
* each and every time we start a new grace period.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int rcu_implicit_offline_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the CPU is offline for more than a jiffy, it is in a quiescent
|
||||
* state. We can trust its state not to change because interrupts
|
||||
* are disabled. The reason for the jiffy's worth of slack is to
|
||||
* handle CPUs initializing on the way up and finding their way
|
||||
* to the idle loop on the way down.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu) &&
|
||||
ULONG_CMP_LT(rdp->rsp->gp_start + 2, jiffies)) {
|
||||
trace_rcu_fqs(rdp->rsp->name, rdp->gpnum, rdp->cpu, "ofl");
|
||||
rdp->offline_fqs++;
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* rcu_idle_enter_common - inform RCU that current CPU is moving towards idle
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -675,7 +646,7 @@ static int dyntick_save_progress_counter(struct rcu_data *rdp)
|
||||
* Return true if the specified CPU has passed through a quiescent
|
||||
* state by virtue of being in or having passed through an dynticks
|
||||
* idle state since the last call to dyntick_save_progress_counter()
|
||||
* for this same CPU.
|
||||
* for this same CPU, or by virtue of having been offline.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -699,8 +670,26 @@ static int rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Go check for the CPU being offline. */
|
||||
return rcu_implicit_offline_qs(rdp);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check for the CPU being offline, but only if the grace period
|
||||
* is old enough. We don't need to worry about the CPU changing
|
||||
* state: If we see it offline even once, it has been through a
|
||||
* quiescent state.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The reason for insisting that the grace period be at least
|
||||
* one jiffy old is that CPUs that are not quite online and that
|
||||
* have just gone offline can still execute RCU read-side critical
|
||||
* sections.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (ULONG_CMP_GE(rdp->rsp->gp_start + 2, jiffies))
|
||||
return 0; /* Grace period is not old enough. */
|
||||
barrier();
|
||||
if (cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu)) {
|
||||
trace_rcu_fqs(rdp->rsp->name, rdp->gpnum, rdp->cpu, "ofl");
|
||||
rdp->offline_fqs++;
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int jiffies_till_stall_check(void)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user