mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-12 05:24:12 +08:00
cpufreq: pass policy to cpufreq_out_of_sync
There is no point finding out the 'policy' again within cpufreq_out_of_sync() when all the callers already have it. Just make them pass policy instead. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2e1cc3a5d7
commit
a1e1dc41c4
@ -1509,30 +1509,23 @@ static void handle_update(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* cpufreq_out_of_sync - If actual and saved CPU frequency differs, we're
|
||||
* in deep trouble.
|
||||
* @cpu: cpu number
|
||||
* @old_freq: CPU frequency the kernel thinks the CPU runs at
|
||||
* @policy: policy managing CPUs
|
||||
* @new_freq: CPU frequency the CPU actually runs at
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We adjust to current frequency first, and need to clean up later.
|
||||
* So either call to cpufreq_update_policy() or schedule handle_update()).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void cpufreq_out_of_sync(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int old_freq,
|
||||
static void cpufreq_out_of_sync(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
|
||||
unsigned int new_freq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
|
||||
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
|
||||
pr_debug("Warning: CPU frequency out of sync: cpufreq and timing core thinks of %u, is %u kHz\n",
|
||||
old_freq, new_freq);
|
||||
policy->cur, new_freq);
|
||||
|
||||
freqs.old = old_freq;
|
||||
freqs.old = policy->cur;
|
||||
freqs.new = new_freq;
|
||||
|
||||
read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
|
||||
policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
|
||||
read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, &freqs);
|
||||
cpufreq_freq_transition_end(policy, &freqs, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1597,7 +1590,7 @@ static unsigned int __cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
|
||||
/* verify no discrepancy between actual and
|
||||
saved value exists */
|
||||
if (unlikely(ret_freq != policy->cur)) {
|
||||
cpufreq_out_of_sync(cpu, policy->cur, ret_freq);
|
||||
cpufreq_out_of_sync(policy, ret_freq);
|
||||
schedule_work(&policy->update);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2302,8 +2295,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
|
||||
policy->cur = new_policy.cur;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (policy->cur != new_policy.cur && has_target())
|
||||
cpufreq_out_of_sync(cpu, policy->cur,
|
||||
new_policy.cur);
|
||||
cpufreq_out_of_sync(policy, new_policy.cur);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user