mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-30 23:54:04 +08:00
rcu: Make cond_resched_rcu_qs() supply RCU-sched expedited QS
Although cond_resched_rcu_qs() supplies quiescent states to all flavors of normal RCU grace periods, it does nothing for expedited RCU-sched grace periods. This commit therefore adds a check for a need for a quiescent state from the current CPU by an expedited RCU-sched grace period, and invokes rcu_sched_qs() to supply that quiescent state if so. Note that the check is racy in that we might be migrated to some other CPU just after checking the per-CPU variable. This is OK because the act of migration will do a context switch, which will supply the needed quiescent state. The only downside is that we might do an unnecessary call to rcu_sched_qs(), but the probability is low and the overhead is small. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
251c617c75
commit
a1e1224849
@ -370,6 +370,21 @@ void rcu_all_qs(void)
|
||||
rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle();
|
||||
local_irq_restore(flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (unlikely(raw_cpu_read(rcu_sched_data.cpu_no_qs.b.exp))) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Yes, we just checked a per-CPU variable with preemption
|
||||
* enabled, so we might be migrated to some other CPU at
|
||||
* this point. That is OK because in that case, the
|
||||
* migration will supply the needed quiescent state.
|
||||
* We might end up needlessly disabling preemption and
|
||||
* invoking rcu_sched_qs() on the destination CPU, but
|
||||
* the probability and cost are both quite low, so this
|
||||
* should not be a problem in practice.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
preempt_disable();
|
||||
rcu_sched_qs();
|
||||
preempt_enable();
|
||||
}
|
||||
this_cpu_inc(rcu_qs_ctr);
|
||||
barrier(); /* Avoid RCU read-side critical sections leaking up. */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user