cifs: delete duplicated words in header files

Drop repeated words in multiple comments.
(be, use, the, See)

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>
Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: samba-technical@lists.samba.org
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
Randy Dunlap 2020-07-19 17:13:16 -07:00 committed by Steve French
parent 60e5e4b3bc
commit a03f507de5
3 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ struct cifs_ace {
/*
* The current SMB3 form of security descriptor is similar to what was used for
* cifs (see above) but some fields are split, and fields in the struct below
* matches names of fields to the the spec, MS-DTYP (see sections 2.4.5 and
* matches names of fields to the spec, MS-DTYP (see sections 2.4.5 and
* 2.4.6). Note that "CamelCase" fields are used in this struct in order to
* match the MS-DTYP and MS-SMB2 specs which define the wire format.
*/
@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ struct smb3_acl {
/*
* Used to store the special 'NFS SIDs' used to persist the POSIX uid and gid
* See See http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh509017(v=ws.10).aspx
* See http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh509017(v=ws.10).aspx
*/
struct owner_sid {
u8 Revision;

View File

@ -1466,7 +1466,7 @@ struct cifsInodeInfo {
struct list_head llist; /* locks helb by this inode */
/*
* NOTE: Some code paths call down_read(lock_sem) twice, so
* we must always use use cifs_down_write() instead of down_write()
* we must always use cifs_down_write() instead of down_write()
* for this semaphore to avoid deadlocks.
*/
struct rw_semaphore lock_sem; /* protect the fields above */

View File

@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
* Note that, due to trying to use names similar to the protocol specifications,
* there are many mixed case field names in the structures below. Although
* this does not match typical Linux kernel style, it is necessary to be
* be able to match against the protocol specfication.
* able to match against the protocol specfication.
*
* SMB2 commands
* Some commands have minimal (wct=0,bcc=0), or uninteresting, responses