mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-03 17:14:14 +08:00
ARM: 7830/1: delay: don't bother reporting bogomips in /proc/cpuinfo
Now that we support a timer-backed delay loop, I'm quickly getting sick and tired of people complaining that their beloved bogomips value has decreased. You know who you are! This patch removes the bogomips line from /proc/cpuinfo, based on the reasoning that any program parsing this is already broken and, as such, won't be further broken if the field is removed. Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
849b882b52
commit
9fc2105aea
@ -991,15 +991,6 @@ static int c_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
|
||||
seq_printf(m, "model name\t: %s rev %d (%s)\n",
|
||||
cpu_name, cpuid & 15, elf_platform);
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
|
||||
seq_printf(m, "BogoMIPS\t: %lu.%02lu\n",
|
||||
per_cpu(cpu_data, i).loops_per_jiffy / (500000UL/HZ),
|
||||
(per_cpu(cpu_data, i).loops_per_jiffy / (5000UL/HZ)) % 100);
|
||||
#else
|
||||
seq_printf(m, "BogoMIPS\t: %lu.%02lu\n",
|
||||
loops_per_jiffy / (500000/HZ),
|
||||
(loops_per_jiffy / (5000/HZ)) % 100);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
/* dump out the processor features */
|
||||
seq_puts(m, "Features\t: ");
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -388,17 +388,8 @@ asmlinkage void secondary_start_kernel(void)
|
||||
|
||||
void __init smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int cpu;
|
||||
unsigned long bogosum = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
|
||||
bogosum += per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu).loops_per_jiffy;
|
||||
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "SMP: Total of %d processors activated "
|
||||
"(%lu.%02lu BogoMIPS).\n",
|
||||
num_online_cpus(),
|
||||
bogosum / (500000/HZ),
|
||||
(bogosum / (5000/HZ)) % 100);
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "SMP: Total of %d processors activated.\n",
|
||||
num_online_cpus());
|
||||
|
||||
hyp_mode_check();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user