BPF fixes:

- Fix a mismatching RCU unlock flavor in bpf_out_neigh_v6
   (Jiawei Ye)
 
 - Fix BPF sockmap with kTLS to reject vsock and unix sockets
   upon kTLS context retrieval (Zijian Zhang)
 
 - Fix BPF bits iterator selftest for s390x (Hou Tao)
 
 Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iIsEABYIADMWIQTFp0I1jqZrAX+hPRXbK58LschIgwUCZzQV0BUcZGFuaWVsQGlv
 Z2VhcmJveC5uZXQACgkQ2yufC7HISIPFywD9Fx9Qc7LdWGmRAmWTqGKSOVPTBC1L
 eC/uXop6sLqapP0A/1KsLQmntvXhp+gmxzPEBdwAwb7/DvyPCQV19FZ/sIkA
 =lDzI
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'bpf-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf

Pull bpf fixes from Daniel Borkmann:

 - Fix a mismatching RCU unlock flavor in bpf_out_neigh_v6 (Jiawei Ye)

 - Fix BPF sockmap with kTLS to reject vsock and unix sockets upon kTLS
   context retrieval (Zijian Zhang)

 - Fix BPF bits iterator selftest for s390x (Hou Tao)

* tag 'bpf-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf:
  bpf: Fix mismatched RCU unlock flavour in bpf_out_neigh_v6
  bpf: Add sk_is_inet and IS_ICSK check in tls_sw_has_ctx_tx/rx
  selftests/bpf: Use -4095 as the bad address for bits iterator
This commit is contained in:
Linus Torvalds 2024-11-13 09:14:19 -08:00
commit 9f8e716d46
3 changed files with 39 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -390,8 +390,12 @@ tls_offload_ctx_tx(const struct tls_context *tls_ctx)
static inline bool tls_sw_has_ctx_tx(const struct sock *sk)
{
struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
struct tls_context *ctx;
if (!sk_is_inet(sk) || !inet_test_bit(IS_ICSK, sk))
return false;
ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
if (!ctx)
return false;
return !!tls_sw_ctx_tx(ctx);
@ -399,8 +403,12 @@ static inline bool tls_sw_has_ctx_tx(const struct sock *sk)
static inline bool tls_sw_has_ctx_rx(const struct sock *sk)
{
struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
struct tls_context *ctx;
if (!sk_is_inet(sk) || !inet_test_bit(IS_ICSK, sk))
return false;
ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
if (!ctx)
return false;
return !!tls_sw_ctx_rx(ctx);

View File

@ -2249,7 +2249,7 @@ static int bpf_out_neigh_v6(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
rcu_read_unlock_bh();
rcu_read_unlock();
if (dst)
IP6_INC_STATS(net, ip6_dst_idev(dst), IPSTATS_MIB_OUTNOROUTES);
out_drop:

View File

@ -57,9 +57,15 @@ __description("null pointer")
__success __retval(0)
int null_pointer(void)
{
int nr = 0;
struct bpf_iter_bits iter;
int err, nr = 0;
int *bit;
err = bpf_iter_bits_new(&iter, NULL, 1);
bpf_iter_bits_destroy(&iter);
if (err != -EINVAL)
return 1;
bpf_for_each(bits, bit, NULL, 1)
nr++;
return nr;
@ -194,15 +200,33 @@ __description("bad words")
__success __retval(0)
int bad_words(void)
{
void *bad_addr = (void *)(3UL << 30);
int nr = 0;
void *bad_addr = (void *)-4095;
struct bpf_iter_bits iter;
volatile int nr;
int *bit;
int err;
err = bpf_iter_bits_new(&iter, bad_addr, 1);
bpf_iter_bits_destroy(&iter);
if (err != -EFAULT)
return 1;
nr = 0;
bpf_for_each(bits, bit, bad_addr, 1)
nr++;
if (nr != 0)
return 2;
err = bpf_iter_bits_new(&iter, bad_addr, 4);
bpf_iter_bits_destroy(&iter);
if (err != -EFAULT)
return 3;
nr = 0;
bpf_for_each(bits, bit, bad_addr, 4)
nr++;
if (nr != 0)
return 4;
return nr;
return 0;
}