mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 12:28:41 +08:00
net/mlx5: offset comp irq index in name by one
The mlx5 comp irq name scheme is changed a little bit between commit3663ad34bc
("net/mlx5: Shift control IRQ to the last index") and commit3354822cde
("net/mlx5: Use dynamic msix vectors allocation"). The index in the comp irq name used to start from 0 but now it starts from 1. There is nothing critical here, but it's harmless to change back to the old behavior, a.k.a starting from 0. Fixes:3354822cde
("net/mlx5: Use dynamic msix vectors allocation") Reviewed-by: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@purestorage.com> Reviewed-by: Yuanyuan Zhong <yzhong@purestorage.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Liang <mliang@purestorage.com> Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409190820.227554-4-tariqt@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c6e77aa9dd
commit
9f7e8fbb91
@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
|
||||
#define MLX5_IRQ_CTRL_SF_MAX 8
|
||||
/* min num of vectors for SFs to be enabled */
|
||||
#define MLX5_IRQ_VEC_COMP_BASE_SF 2
|
||||
#define MLX5_IRQ_VEC_COMP_BASE 1
|
||||
|
||||
#define MLX5_EQ_SHARE_IRQ_MAX_COMP (8)
|
||||
#define MLX5_EQ_SHARE_IRQ_MAX_CTRL (UINT_MAX)
|
||||
@ -246,6 +247,7 @@ static void irq_set_name(struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool, char *name, int vecidx)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
vecidx -= MLX5_IRQ_VEC_COMP_BASE;
|
||||
snprintf(name, MLX5_MAX_IRQ_NAME, "mlx5_comp%d", vecidx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -585,7 +587,7 @@ struct mlx5_irq *mlx5_irq_request_vector(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, u16 cpu,
|
||||
struct mlx5_irq_table *table = mlx5_irq_table_get(dev);
|
||||
struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool = table->pcif_pool;
|
||||
struct irq_affinity_desc af_desc;
|
||||
int offset = 1;
|
||||
int offset = MLX5_IRQ_VEC_COMP_BASE;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!pool->xa_num_irqs.max)
|
||||
offset = 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user