mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 04:18:39 +08:00
sched/topology: Handle NUMA_NO_NODE in sched_numa_find_nth_cpu()
sched_numa_find_nth_cpu() doesn't handle NUMA_NO_NODE properly, and may crash kernel if passed with it. On the other hand, the only user of sched_numa_find_nth_cpu() has to check NUMA_NO_NODE case explicitly. It would be easier for users if this logic will get moved into sched_numa_find_nth_cpu(). Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230819141239.287290-6-yury.norov@gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
8ab63d418d
commit
9ecea9ae4d
@ -2126,6 +2126,9 @@ int sched_numa_find_nth_cpu(const struct cpumask *cpus, int cpu, int node)
|
||||
struct cpumask ***hop_masks;
|
||||
int hop, ret = nr_cpu_ids;
|
||||
|
||||
if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
|
||||
return cpumask_nth_and(cpu, cpus, cpu_online_mask);
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
|
||||
/* CPU-less node entries are uninitialized in sched_domains_numa_masks */
|
||||
|
@ -146,9 +146,7 @@ unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
|
||||
/* Wrap: we always want a cpu. */
|
||||
i %= num_online_cpus();
|
||||
|
||||
cpu = (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) ?
|
||||
cpumask_nth(i, cpu_online_mask) :
|
||||
sched_numa_find_nth_cpu(cpu_online_mask, i, node);
|
||||
cpu = sched_numa_find_nth_cpu(cpu_online_mask, i, node);
|
||||
|
||||
WARN_ON(cpu >= nr_cpu_ids);
|
||||
return cpu;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user