mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-13 14:24:11 +08:00
locking/rwsem-xadd: Fix missed wakeup due to reordering of load
If a spinner is present, there is a chance that the load of rwsem_has_spinner() in rwsem_wake() can be reordered with respect to decrement of rwsem count in __up_write() leading to wakeup being missed: spinning writer up_write caller --------------- ----------------------- [S] osq_unlock() [L] osq spin_lock(wait_lock) sem->count=0xFFFFFFFF00000001 +0xFFFFFFFF00000000 count=sem->count MB sem->count=0xFFFFFFFE00000001 -0xFFFFFFFF00000001 spin_trylock(wait_lock) return rwsem_try_write_lock(count) spin_unlock(wait_lock) schedule() Reordering of atomic_long_sub_return_release() in __up_write() and rwsem_has_spinner() in rwsem_wake() can cause missing of wakeup in up_write() context. In spinning writer, sem->count and local variable count is 0XFFFFFFFE00000001. It would result in rwsem_try_write_lock() failing to acquire rwsem and spinning writer going to sleep in rwsem_down_write_failed(). The smp_rmb() will make sure that the spinner state is consulted after sem->count is updated in up_write context. Signed-off-by: Prateek Sood <prsood@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: longman@redhat.com Cc: parri.andrea@gmail.com Cc: sramana@codeaurora.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1504794658-15397-1-git-send-email-prsood@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c74aef2d06
commit
9c29c31830
@ -612,6 +612,33 @@ struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* __rwsem_down_write_failed_common(sem)
|
||||
* rwsem_optimistic_spin(sem)
|
||||
* osq_unlock(sem->osq)
|
||||
* ...
|
||||
* atomic_long_add_return(&sem->count)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* - VS -
|
||||
*
|
||||
* __up_write()
|
||||
* if (atomic_long_sub_return_release(&sem->count) < 0)
|
||||
* rwsem_wake(sem)
|
||||
* osq_is_locked(&sem->osq)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* And __up_write() must observe !osq_is_locked() when it observes the
|
||||
* atomic_long_add_return() in order to not miss a wakeup.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This boils down to:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* [S.rel] X = 1 [RmW] r0 = (Y += 0)
|
||||
* MB RMB
|
||||
* [RmW] Y += 1 [L] r1 = X
|
||||
*
|
||||
* exists (r0=1 /\ r1=0)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
smp_rmb();
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If a spinner is present, it is not necessary to do the wakeup.
|
||||
* Try to do wakeup only if the trylock succeeds to minimize
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user