mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-16 00:34:20 +08:00
Blackfin: fix hweight breakage
The recent commit to add constant optimization to hweight implicitly broke the Blackfin arch. Seems we were missed when all the other arches were fixed with renames. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9ee47476d6
commit
97e94c3a57
@ -22,7 +22,9 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#include <asm-generic/bitops/sched.h>
|
||||
#include <asm-generic/bitops/ffs.h>
|
||||
#include <asm-generic/bitops/const_hweight.h>
|
||||
#include <asm-generic/bitops/lock.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include <asm-generic/bitops/ext2-non-atomic.h>
|
||||
#include <asm-generic/bitops/ext2-atomic.h>
|
||||
#include <asm-generic/bitops/minix.h>
|
||||
@ -115,7 +117,7 @@ static inline int test_and_change_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
|
||||
* of bits set) of a N-bit word
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
static inline unsigned int hweight32(unsigned int w)
|
||||
static inline unsigned int __arch_hweight32(unsigned int w)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int res;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -125,19 +127,20 @@ static inline unsigned int hweight32(unsigned int w)
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline unsigned int hweight64(__u64 w)
|
||||
static inline unsigned int __arch_hweight64(__u64 w)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return hweight32((unsigned int)(w >> 32)) + hweight32((unsigned int)w);
|
||||
return __arch_hweight32((unsigned int)(w >> 32)) +
|
||||
__arch_hweight32((unsigned int)w);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline unsigned int hweight16(unsigned int w)
|
||||
static inline unsigned int __arch_hweight16(unsigned int w)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return hweight32(w & 0xffff);
|
||||
return __arch_hweight32(w & 0xffff);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline unsigned int hweight8(unsigned int w)
|
||||
static inline unsigned int __arch_hweight8(unsigned int w)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return hweight32(w & 0xff);
|
||||
return __arch_hweight32(w & 0xff);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* _BLACKFIN_BITOPS_H */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user