mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 12:28:41 +08:00
xfs: clean up inode locking for RENAME_WHITEOUT
When doing RENAME_WHITEOUT, we now have to lock 5 inodes into the rename transaction. This means we need to update xfs_sort_for_rename() and xfs_lock_inodes() to handle up to 5 inodes. Because of the vagaries of rename, this means we could have anywhere between 3 and 5 inodes locked into the transaction.... While xfs_lock_inodes() does not need anything other than an assert telling us we are passing more inodes that we ever thought we should see, it could do with a logic rework to remove all the indenting. This is not a functional change - it just makes the code a lot easier to read. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
444a702231
commit
95afcf5c7b
@ -329,15 +329,14 @@ xfs_lock_inumorder(int lock_mode, int subclass)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The following routine will lock n inodes in exclusive mode.
|
||||
* We assume the caller calls us with the inodes in i_ino order.
|
||||
* The following routine will lock n inodes in exclusive mode. We assume the
|
||||
* caller calls us with the inodes in i_ino order.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We need to detect deadlock where an inode that we lock
|
||||
* is in the AIL and we start waiting for another inode that is locked
|
||||
* by a thread in a long running transaction (such as truncate). This can
|
||||
* result in deadlock since the long running trans might need to wait
|
||||
* for the inode we just locked in order to push the tail and free space
|
||||
* in the log.
|
||||
* We need to detect deadlock where an inode that we lock is in the AIL and we
|
||||
* start waiting for another inode that is locked by a thread in a long running
|
||||
* transaction (such as truncate). This can result in deadlock since the long
|
||||
* running trans might need to wait for the inode we just locked in order to
|
||||
* push the tail and free space in the log.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void
|
||||
xfs_lock_inodes(
|
||||
@ -348,30 +347,27 @@ xfs_lock_inodes(
|
||||
int attempts = 0, i, j, try_lock;
|
||||
xfs_log_item_t *lp;
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT(ips && (inodes >= 2)); /* we need at least two */
|
||||
/* currently supports between 2 and 5 inodes */
|
||||
ASSERT(ips && inodes >= 2 && inodes <= 5);
|
||||
|
||||
try_lock = 0;
|
||||
i = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
again:
|
||||
for (; i < inodes; i++) {
|
||||
ASSERT(ips[i]);
|
||||
|
||||
if (i && (ips[i] == ips[i-1])) /* Already locked */
|
||||
if (i && (ips[i] == ips[i - 1])) /* Already locked */
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If try_lock is not set yet, make sure all locked inodes
|
||||
* are not in the AIL.
|
||||
* If any are, set try_lock to be used later.
|
||||
* If try_lock is not set yet, make sure all locked inodes are
|
||||
* not in the AIL. If any are, set try_lock to be used later.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (!try_lock) {
|
||||
for (j = (i - 1); j >= 0 && !try_lock; j--) {
|
||||
lp = (xfs_log_item_t *)ips[j]->i_itemp;
|
||||
if (lp && (lp->li_flags & XFS_LI_IN_AIL)) {
|
||||
if (lp && (lp->li_flags & XFS_LI_IN_AIL))
|
||||
try_lock++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -381,51 +377,42 @@ again:
|
||||
* we can't get any, we must release all we have
|
||||
* and try again.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (try_lock) {
|
||||
/* try_lock must be 0 if i is 0. */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* try_lock means we have an inode locked
|
||||
* that is in the AIL.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ASSERT(i != 0);
|
||||
if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ips[i], xfs_lock_inumorder(lock_mode, i))) {
|
||||
attempts++;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Unlock all previous guys and try again.
|
||||
* xfs_iunlock will try to push the tail
|
||||
* if the inode is in the AIL.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
for(j = i - 1; j >= 0; j--) {
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check to see if we've already
|
||||
* unlocked this one.
|
||||
* Not the first one going back,
|
||||
* and the inode ptr is the same.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((j != (i - 1)) && ips[j] ==
|
||||
ips[j+1])
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
xfs_iunlock(ips[j], lock_mode);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ((attempts % 5) == 0) {
|
||||
delay(1); /* Don't just spin the CPU */
|
||||
#ifdef DEBUG
|
||||
xfs_lock_delays++;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
i = 0;
|
||||
try_lock = 0;
|
||||
goto again;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (!try_lock) {
|
||||
xfs_ilock(ips[i], xfs_lock_inumorder(lock_mode, i));
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* try_lock means we have an inode locked that is in the AIL. */
|
||||
ASSERT(i != 0);
|
||||
if (xfs_ilock_nowait(ips[i], xfs_lock_inumorder(lock_mode, i)))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Unlock all previous guys and try again. xfs_iunlock will try
|
||||
* to push the tail if the inode is in the AIL.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
attempts++;
|
||||
for (j = i - 1; j >= 0; j--) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check to see if we've already unlocked this one. Not
|
||||
* the first one going back, and the inode ptr is the
|
||||
* same.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (j != (i - 1) && ips[j] == ips[j + 1])
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
xfs_iunlock(ips[j], lock_mode);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ((attempts % 5) == 0) {
|
||||
delay(1); /* Don't just spin the CPU */
|
||||
#ifdef DEBUG
|
||||
xfs_lock_delays++;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
i = 0;
|
||||
try_lock = 0;
|
||||
goto again;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef DEBUG
|
||||
@ -2615,19 +2602,22 @@ xfs_remove(
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Enter all inodes for a rename transaction into a sorted array.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define __XFS_SORT_INODES 5
|
||||
STATIC void
|
||||
xfs_sort_for_rename(
|
||||
xfs_inode_t *dp1, /* in: old (source) directory inode */
|
||||
xfs_inode_t *dp2, /* in: new (target) directory inode */
|
||||
xfs_inode_t *ip1, /* in: inode of old entry */
|
||||
xfs_inode_t *ip2, /* in: inode of new entry, if it
|
||||
already exists, NULL otherwise. */
|
||||
xfs_inode_t **i_tab,/* out: array of inode returned, sorted */
|
||||
int *num_inodes) /* out: number of inodes in array */
|
||||
struct xfs_inode *dp1, /* in: old (source) directory inode */
|
||||
struct xfs_inode *dp2, /* in: new (target) directory inode */
|
||||
struct xfs_inode *ip1, /* in: inode of old entry */
|
||||
struct xfs_inode *ip2, /* in: inode of new entry */
|
||||
struct xfs_inode *wip, /* in: whiteout inode */
|
||||
struct xfs_inode **i_tab,/* out: sorted array of inodes */
|
||||
int *num_inodes) /* in/out: inodes in array */
|
||||
{
|
||||
xfs_inode_t *temp;
|
||||
int i, j;
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT(*num_inodes == __XFS_SORT_INODES);
|
||||
memset(i_tab, 0, *num_inodes * sizeof(struct xfs_inode *));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* i_tab contains a list of pointers to inodes. We initialize
|
||||
* the table here & we'll sort it. We will then use it to
|
||||
@ -2635,25 +2625,24 @@ xfs_sort_for_rename(
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note that the table may contain duplicates. e.g., dp1 == dp2.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
i_tab[0] = dp1;
|
||||
i_tab[1] = dp2;
|
||||
i_tab[2] = ip1;
|
||||
if (ip2) {
|
||||
*num_inodes = 4;
|
||||
i_tab[3] = ip2;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
*num_inodes = 3;
|
||||
i_tab[3] = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
i = 0;
|
||||
i_tab[i++] = dp1;
|
||||
i_tab[i++] = dp2;
|
||||
i_tab[i++] = ip1;
|
||||
if (ip2)
|
||||
i_tab[i++] = ip2;
|
||||
if (wip)
|
||||
i_tab[i++] = wip;
|
||||
*num_inodes = i;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Sort the elements via bubble sort. (Remember, there are at
|
||||
* most 4 elements to sort, so this is adequate.)
|
||||
* most 5 elements to sort, so this is adequate.)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < *num_inodes; i++) {
|
||||
for (j = 1; j < *num_inodes; j++) {
|
||||
if (i_tab[j]->i_ino < i_tab[j-1]->i_ino) {
|
||||
temp = i_tab[j];
|
||||
struct xfs_inode *temp = i_tab[j];
|
||||
i_tab[j] = i_tab[j-1];
|
||||
i_tab[j-1] = temp;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2801,16 +2790,16 @@ xfs_rename(
|
||||
xfs_fsblock_t first_block;
|
||||
int cancel_flags;
|
||||
int committed;
|
||||
xfs_inode_t *inodes[4];
|
||||
xfs_inode_t *inodes[__XFS_SORT_INODES];
|
||||
int num_inodes = __XFS_SORT_INODES;
|
||||
int spaceres;
|
||||
int num_inodes;
|
||||
|
||||
trace_xfs_rename(src_dp, target_dp, src_name, target_name);
|
||||
|
||||
new_parent = (src_dp != target_dp);
|
||||
src_is_directory = S_ISDIR(src_ip->i_d.di_mode);
|
||||
|
||||
xfs_sort_for_rename(src_dp, target_dp, src_ip, target_ip,
|
||||
xfs_sort_for_rename(src_dp, target_dp, src_ip, target_ip, NULL,
|
||||
inodes, &num_inodes);
|
||||
|
||||
xfs_bmap_init(&free_list, &first_block);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user