scsi: pm8001: Use non-atomic bitmap ops for tag alloc + free

In pm8001_tag_alloc() we don't require atomic set_bit() as we are already
in atomic context. In pm8001_tag_free() we should use the same host
spinlock to protect clearing the tag (and then don't require the atomic
clear_bit()).

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1654879602-33497-4-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com
Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
John Garry 2022-06-11 00:46:41 +08:00 committed by Martin K. Petersen
parent 98132d842d
commit 940f5efa63

View File

@ -66,7 +66,11 @@ static int pm8001_find_tag(struct sas_task *task, u32 *tag)
void pm8001_tag_free(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 tag)
{
void *bitmap = pm8001_ha->tags;
clear_bit(tag, bitmap);
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&pm8001_ha->bitmap_lock, flags);
__clear_bit(tag, bitmap);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm8001_ha->bitmap_lock, flags);
}
/**
@ -76,9 +80,9 @@ void pm8001_tag_free(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 tag)
*/
int pm8001_tag_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 *tag_out)
{
unsigned int tag;
void *bitmap = pm8001_ha->tags;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int tag;
spin_lock_irqsave(&pm8001_ha->bitmap_lock, flags);
tag = find_first_zero_bit(bitmap, pm8001_ha->tags_num);
@ -86,7 +90,7 @@ int pm8001_tag_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 *tag_out)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm8001_ha->bitmap_lock, flags);
return -SAS_QUEUE_FULL;
}
set_bit(tag, bitmap);
__set_bit(tag, bitmap);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm8001_ha->bitmap_lock, flags);
*tag_out = tag;
return 0;