mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-25 21:24:08 +08:00
wext: handle NULL extra data in iwe_stream_add_point better
gcc-7 complains that wl3501_cs passes NULL into a function that then uses the argument as the input for memcpy: drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c: In function 'wl3501_get_scan': include/net/iw_handler.h:559:3: error: argument 2 null where non-null expected [-Werror=nonnull] memcpy(stream + point_len, extra, iwe->u.data.length); This works fine here because iwe->u.data.length is guaranteed to be 0 and the memcpy doesn't actually have an effect. Making the length check explicit avoids the warning and should have no other effect here. Also check the pointer itself, since otherwise we get warnings elsewhere in the code. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7acec26cec
commit
93be2b7427
@ -556,7 +556,8 @@ iwe_stream_add_point(struct iw_request_info *info, char *stream, char *ends,
|
||||
memcpy(stream + lcp_len,
|
||||
((char *) &iwe->u) + IW_EV_POINT_OFF,
|
||||
IW_EV_POINT_PK_LEN - IW_EV_LCP_PK_LEN);
|
||||
memcpy(stream + point_len, extra, iwe->u.data.length);
|
||||
if (iwe->u.data.length && extra)
|
||||
memcpy(stream + point_len, extra, iwe->u.data.length);
|
||||
stream += event_len;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return stream;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user