From 91438aebcd56ed3cfa480e4546c7b06e9db3c73c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 18:46:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: scan: Fix up _DEP-related terminology with supplier/consumer The ACPI namespace scanning code uses the terms master/slave when populating the list of _DEP dependencies, but that use has no external exposures and is not mandated by nor associated with any external specifications. Change the language used through-out to supplier/consumer. No functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede --- drivers/acpi/scan.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c index 560385e35d3d..37317e0ed65d 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c @@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ static u64 spcr_uart_addr; struct acpi_dep_data { struct list_head node; - acpi_handle master; - acpi_handle slave; + acpi_handle supplier; + acpi_handle consumer; }; void acpi_scan_lock_acquire(void) @@ -1881,8 +1881,8 @@ static void acpi_device_dep_initialize(struct acpi_device *adev) if (!dep) return; - dep->master = dep_devices.handles[i]; - dep->slave = adev->handle; + dep->supplier = dep_devices.handles[i]; + dep->consumer = adev->handle; adev->dep_unmet++; mutex_lock(&acpi_dep_list_lock); @@ -2058,8 +2058,8 @@ void acpi_walk_dep_device_list(acpi_handle handle) mutex_lock(&acpi_dep_list_lock); list_for_each_entry_safe(dep, tmp, &acpi_dep_list, node) { - if (dep->master == handle) { - acpi_bus_get_device(dep->slave, &adev); + if (dep->supplier == handle) { + acpi_bus_get_device(dep->consumer, &adev); if (!adev) continue;