exec: Distinguish in_execve from in_exec

Just to help distinguish the fs->in_exec flag from the current->in_execve
flag, add comments in check_unsafe_exec() and copy_fs() for more
context. Also note that in_execve is only used by TOMOYO now.

Cc: Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@nttdata.co.jp>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
Kees Cook 2024-01-24 11:15:33 -08:00
parent 84c39ec57d
commit 90383cc078
3 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -1633,6 +1633,7 @@ static void check_unsafe_exec(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
}
rcu_read_unlock();
/* "users" and "in_exec" locked for copy_fs() */
if (p->fs->users > n_fs)
bprm->unsafe |= LSM_UNSAFE_SHARE;
else

View File

@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ struct task_struct {
unsigned sched_rt_mutex:1;
#endif
/* Bit to tell LSMs we're in execve(): */
/* Bit to tell TOMOYO we're in execve(): */
unsigned in_execve:1;
unsigned in_iowait:1;
#ifndef TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK

View File

@ -1748,6 +1748,7 @@ static int copy_fs(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
if (clone_flags & CLONE_FS) {
/* tsk->fs is already what we want */
spin_lock(&fs->lock);
/* "users" and "in_exec" locked for check_unsafe_exec() */
if (fs->in_exec) {
spin_unlock(&fs->lock);
return -EAGAIN;