mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-14 06:24:53 +08:00
xfs: remote attribute allocation may be contiguous
When CRCs are enabled, there may be multiple allocations made if the headers cause a length overflow. This, however, does not mean that the number of headers required increases, as the second and subsequent extents may be contiguous with the previous extent. Hence when we map the extents to write the attribute data, we may end up with less extents than allocations made. Hence the assertion that we consume the number of headers we calculated in the allocation loop is incorrect and needs to be removed. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f648167f3a
commit
90253cf142
@ -359,6 +359,11 @@ xfs_attr_rmtval_set(
|
||||
* into requiring more blocks. e.g. for 512 byte blocks, we'll
|
||||
* spill for another block every 9 headers we require in this
|
||||
* loop.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note that this can result in contiguous allocation of blocks,
|
||||
* so we don't use all the space we allocate for headers as we
|
||||
* have one less header for each contiguous allocation that
|
||||
* occurs in the map/write loop below.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (crcs && blkcnt == 0) {
|
||||
int total_len;
|
||||
@ -439,7 +444,6 @@ xfs_attr_rmtval_set(
|
||||
lblkno += map.br_blockcount;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ASSERT(valuelen == 0);
|
||||
ASSERT(hdrcnt == 0);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user