korg/linux
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git synced 2024-11-26 13:44:15 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix readahead calculations in xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents()

Browse Source 
This is for bug #850,
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=850
XFS file system segfaults , repeatedly and 100% reproducable in 2.6.30 , 2.6.31

The above only showed up on a CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG=y kernel, because
xfs_bmapi() ASSERTs that it has been asked for at least one map,

and it was getting 0.

The root cause is that our guesstimated "bufsize" from xfs_file_readdir
was fairly small, and the

		bufsize -= length;

in the loop was going negative - except bufsize is a size_t, so it
was wrapping to a very large number.

Then when we did
		ra_want = howmany(bufsize + mp->m_dirblksize,
				  mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize) - 1;

with that very large number, the (int) ra_want was coming out
negative, and a subsequent compare:

		if (1 + ra_want > map_blocks ...

was coming out -true- (negative int compare w/ uint) and we went
back to xfs_bmapi() for more, even though we did not need more,
and asked for 0 maps, and hit the ASSERT.

We have kind of a type mess here, but just keeping bufsize from
going negative is probably sufficient to avoid the problem.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
This commit is contained in:
Eric Sandeen 2009-09-25 19:42:26 +00:00 committed by Alex Elder
parent dce5065a57
commit 8e69ce1471
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c
View File

@ -854,6 +854,7 @@ xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents(
*/
ra_want = howmany(bufsize + mp->m_dirblksize,
mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize) - 1;
ASSERT(ra_want >= 0);
/*
* If we don't have as many as we want, and we haven't
@ -1088,7 +1089,8 @@ xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents(
*/
ptr += length;
curoff += length;
bufsize -= length;
/* bufsize may have just been a guess; don't go negative */
bufsize = bufsize > length ? bufsize - length : 0;
}
/*