mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-28 22:54:05 +08:00
memcg: update document to mention that swapoff should be tested
Considering the recently found problem "memcg: fix refcnt handling at swapoff", it's better to mention swapoff behavior in the memcg_test document. Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
85d9fc89fb
commit
8d50d369d1
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
Memory Resource Controller(Memcg) Implementation Memo.
|
||||
Last Updated: 2008/12/15
|
||||
Base Kernel Version: based on 2.6.28-rc8-mm.
|
||||
Last Updated: 2009/1/19
|
||||
Base Kernel Version: based on 2.6.29-rc2.
|
||||
|
||||
Because VM is getting complex (one of reasons is memcg...), memcg's behavior
|
||||
is complex. This is a document for memcg's internal behavior.
|
||||
@ -340,3 +340,23 @@ Under below explanation, we assume CONFIG_MEM_RES_CTRL_SWAP=y.
|
||||
# mount -t cgroup none /cgroup -t cpuset,memory,cpu,devices
|
||||
|
||||
and do task move, mkdir, rmdir etc...under this.
|
||||
|
||||
9.7 swapoff.
|
||||
Besides management of swap is one of complicated parts of memcg,
|
||||
call path of swap-in at swapoff is not same as usual swap-in path..
|
||||
It's worth to be tested explicitly.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, test like following is good.
|
||||
(Shell-A)
|
||||
# mount -t cgroup none /cgroup -t memory
|
||||
# mkdir /cgroup/test
|
||||
# echo 40M > /cgroup/test/memory.limit_in_bytes
|
||||
# echo 0 > /cgroup/test/tasks
|
||||
Run malloc(100M) program under this. You'll see 60M of swaps.
|
||||
(Shell-B)
|
||||
# move all tasks in /cgroup/test to /cgroup
|
||||
# /sbin/swapoff -a
|
||||
# rmdir /test/cgroup
|
||||
# kill malloc task.
|
||||
|
||||
Of course, tmpfs v.s. swapoff test should be tested, too.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user