mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 21:38:32 +08:00
sched/rt: Fix Sparse warnings due to undefined rt.c declarations
There are several symbols defined in kernel/sched/sched.h but get wrapped in CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED, even though dummy versions get built in rt.c and therefore trigger Sparse warnings: kernel/sched/rt.c:309:6: warning: symbol 'unregister_rt_sched_group' was not declared. Should it be static? kernel/sched/rt.c:311:6: warning: symbol 'free_rt_sched_group' was not declared. Should it be static? kernel/sched/rt.c:313:5: warning: symbol 'alloc_rt_sched_group' was not declared. Should it be static? Fix this by moving them outside the CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED block. [ mingo: Refreshed to the latest scheduler tree, tweaked changelog. ] Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220721145155.358366-1-ben-linux@fluff.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
dcca34754a
commit
87514b2c24
@ -480,9 +480,6 @@ extern void __refill_cfs_bandwidth_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b);
|
||||
extern void start_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b);
|
||||
extern void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
|
||||
|
||||
extern void unregister_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg);
|
||||
extern void free_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg);
|
||||
extern int alloc_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, struct task_group *parent);
|
||||
extern void init_tg_rt_entry(struct task_group *tg, struct rt_rq *rt_rq,
|
||||
struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, int cpu,
|
||||
struct sched_rt_entity *parent);
|
||||
@ -520,6 +517,10 @@ struct cfs_bandwidth { };
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED */
|
||||
|
||||
extern void unregister_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg);
|
||||
extern void free_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg);
|
||||
extern int alloc_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, struct task_group *parent);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* u64_u32_load/u64_u32_store
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user