mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-05 18:14:07 +08:00
arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs
Scheduling a 32-bit application on a 64-bit-only CPU is a bad idea. Ensure that 32-bit applications always take the slow-path when returning to userspace on a system with mismatched support at EL0, so that we can avoid trying to run on a 64-bit-only CPU and force a SIGKILL instead. Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210608180313.11502-5-will@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2f6a49bbc0
commit
873c3e8977
@ -527,6 +527,15 @@ static void erratum_1418040_thread_switch(struct task_struct *prev,
|
||||
write_sysreg(val, cntkctl_el1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void compat_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(next)))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0))
|
||||
set_tsk_thread_flag(next, TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void update_sctlr_el1(u64 sctlr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -568,6 +577,7 @@ __notrace_funcgraph struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
|
||||
ssbs_thread_switch(next);
|
||||
erratum_1418040_thread_switch(prev, next);
|
||||
ptrauth_thread_switch_user(next);
|
||||
compat_thread_switch(next);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Complete any pending TLB or cache maintenance on this CPU in case
|
||||
@ -633,8 +643,15 @@ unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void arch_setup_new_exec(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
current->mm->context.flags = is_compat_task() ? MMCF_AARCH32 : 0;
|
||||
unsigned long mmflags = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_compat_task()) {
|
||||
mmflags = MMCF_AARCH32;
|
||||
if (static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0))
|
||||
set_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
current->mm->context.flags = mmflags;
|
||||
ptrauth_thread_init_user();
|
||||
mte_thread_init_user();
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -911,6 +911,19 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
restore_saved_sigmask();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool cpu_affinity_invalid(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!compat_user_mode(regs))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We're preemptible, but a reschedule will cause us to check the
|
||||
* affinity again.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return !cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(),
|
||||
system_32bit_el0_cpumask());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
asmlinkage void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs,
|
||||
unsigned long thread_flags)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -938,6 +951,19 @@ asmlinkage void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs,
|
||||
if (thread_flags & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME) {
|
||||
tracehook_notify_resume(regs);
|
||||
rseq_handle_notify_resume(NULL, regs);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we reschedule after checking the affinity
|
||||
* then we must ensure that TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
|
||||
* is set so that we check the affinity again.
|
||||
* Since tracehook_notify_resume() clears the
|
||||
* flag, ensure that the compiler doesn't move
|
||||
* it after the affinity check.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
barrier();
|
||||
|
||||
if (cpu_affinity_invalid(regs))
|
||||
force_sig(SIGKILL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (thread_flags & _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user