KVM: MMU: cleanup FNAME(fetch)() functions

Cleanup this function that we are already get the direct sp's access

Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Xiao Guangrong 2010-06-30 16:05:00 +08:00 committed by Avi Kivity
parent 9e7b0e7fba
commit 84754cd8fc

View File

@ -306,12 +306,18 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
gfn_t table_gfn;
int r;
int level;
bool dirty = is_dirty_gpte(gw->ptes[gw->level - 1]);
unsigned direct_access;
pt_element_t curr_pte;
struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator iterator;
if (!is_present_gpte(gw->ptes[gw->level - 1]))
return NULL;
direct_access = gw->pt_access & gw->pte_access;
if (!dirty)
direct_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
for_each_shadow_entry(vcpu, addr, iterator) {
level = iterator.level;
sptep = iterator.sptep;
@ -319,15 +325,13 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
mmu_set_spte(vcpu, sptep, access,
gw->pte_access & access,
user_fault, write_fault,
is_dirty_gpte(gw->ptes[gw->level-1]),
ptwrite, level,
dirty, ptwrite, level,
gw->gfn, pfn, false, true);
break;
}
if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) && !is_large_pte(*sptep)) {
struct kvm_mmu_page *child;
unsigned direct_access;
if (level != gw->level)
continue;
@ -339,10 +343,6 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
* so we should update the spte at this point to get
* a new sp with the correct access.
*/
direct_access = gw->pt_access & gw->pte_access;
if (!is_dirty_gpte(gw->ptes[gw->level - 1]))
direct_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
child = page_header(*sptep & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
if (child->role.access == direct_access)
continue;
@ -359,11 +359,8 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
}
if (level <= gw->level) {
int delta = level - gw->level + 1;
direct = 1;
if (!is_dirty_gpte(gw->ptes[level - delta]))
access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
access &= gw->pte_access;
access = direct_access;
/*
* It is a large guest pages backed by small host pages,