mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-17 17:24:17 +08:00
GIC: Dont disable INT in ack callback
Masking in the ack callback fails to work with handle_percpu_irq and handle_edge_irq. The interrupt stays disabled after the first invocation since percpu and edge irq do not unmask an interrupt after handling it. For handle_level_irq masking in the ack is redundant because ack is always called after mask in the mask_ack function. Masking in the ack function is required only when __do_IRQ was used instead of flow handlers, but using __do_IRQ has been deprecated. Remove the masking of interrupt from the ack callback. Signed-off-by: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Ohlstein <johlstei@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b30a3f6257
commit
846afbd1fe
@ -67,25 +67,11 @@ static inline unsigned int gic_irq(unsigned int irq)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Routines to acknowledge, disable and enable interrupts
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Linux assumes that when we're done with an interrupt we need to
|
||||
* unmask it, in the same way we need to unmask an interrupt when
|
||||
* we first enable it.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The GIC has a separate notion of "end of interrupt" to re-enable
|
||||
* an interrupt after handling, in order to support hardware
|
||||
* prioritisation.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We can make the GIC behave in the way that Linux expects by making
|
||||
* our "acknowledge" routine disable the interrupt, then mark it as
|
||||
* complete.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void gic_ack_irq(unsigned int irq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u32 mask = 1 << (irq % 32);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
|
||||
writel(mask, gic_dist_base(irq) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(irq) / 32) * 4);
|
||||
writel(gic_irq(irq), gic_cpu_base(irq) + GIC_CPU_EOI);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user