mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 04:18:39 +08:00
filemap: Drop the refcount while waiting for page lock
Commit bd8a1f3655
("mm/filemap: support readpage splitting a page")
changed the read_iter path to drop the refcount while waiting for the
page lock. However, it missed the same pattern in read_mapping_page()
and friends. Use the same pattern in do_read_cache_folio() that is
used in filemap_update_page().
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
539a3322f2
commit
81f4c03b7d
43
mm/filemap.c
43
mm/filemap.c
@ -3460,45 +3460,12 @@ filler:
|
||||
if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Page is not up to date and may be locked due to one of the following
|
||||
* case a: Page is being filled and the page lock is held
|
||||
* case b: Read/write error clearing the page uptodate status
|
||||
* case c: Truncation in progress (page locked)
|
||||
* case d: Reclaim in progress
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Case a, the page will be up to date when the page is unlocked.
|
||||
* There is no need to serialise on the page lock here as the page
|
||||
* is pinned so the lock gives no additional protection. Even if the
|
||||
* page is truncated, the data is still valid if PageUptodate as
|
||||
* it's a race vs truncate race.
|
||||
* Case b, the page will not be up to date
|
||||
* Case c, the page may be truncated but in itself, the data may still
|
||||
* be valid after IO completes as it's a read vs truncate race. The
|
||||
* operation must restart if the page is not uptodate on unlock but
|
||||
* otherwise serialising on page lock to stabilise the mapping gives
|
||||
* no additional guarantees to the caller as the page lock is
|
||||
* released before return.
|
||||
* Case d, similar to truncation. If reclaim holds the page lock, it
|
||||
* will be a race with remove_mapping that determines if the mapping
|
||||
* is valid on unlock but otherwise the data is valid and there is
|
||||
* no need to serialise with page lock.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* As the page lock gives no additional guarantee, we optimistically
|
||||
* wait on the page to be unlocked and check if it's up to date and
|
||||
* use the page if it is. Otherwise, the page lock is required to
|
||||
* distinguish between the different cases. The motivation is that we
|
||||
* avoid spurious serialisations and wakeups when multiple processes
|
||||
* wait on the same page for IO to complete.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
folio_wait_locked(folio);
|
||||
if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
if (!folio_trylock(folio)) {
|
||||
folio_put_wait_locked(folio, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
|
||||
goto repeat;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Distinguish between all the cases under the safety of the lock */
|
||||
folio_lock(folio);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Case c or d, restart the operation */
|
||||
/* Folio was truncated from mapping */
|
||||
if (!folio->mapping) {
|
||||
folio_unlock(folio);
|
||||
folio_put(folio);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user