mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 12:28:41 +08:00
net: Flush local routes when device changes vrf association
The VRF driver cycles netdevs when an interface is enslaved or released: the down event is used to flush neighbor and route tables and the up event (if the interface was already up) effectively moves local and connected routes to the proper table. As of4f823defdd
the local route is left hanging around after a link down, so when a netdev is moved from one VRF to another (or released from a VRF altogether) local routes are left in the wrong table. Fix by handling the NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER event. When the upper dev is an L3mdev then call fib_disable_ip to flush all routes, local ones to. Fixes:4f823defdd
("ipv4: fix to not remove local route on link down") Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
98900a80d5
commit
7f49e7a38b
@ -1155,6 +1155,7 @@ static int fib_inetaddr_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event,
|
||||
static int fib_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, void *ptr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct net_device *dev = netdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
|
||||
struct netdev_notifier_changeupper_info *info;
|
||||
struct in_device *in_dev;
|
||||
struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
|
||||
unsigned int flags;
|
||||
@ -1193,6 +1194,14 @@ static int fib_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event, vo
|
||||
case NETDEV_CHANGEMTU:
|
||||
rt_cache_flush(net);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER:
|
||||
info = ptr;
|
||||
/* flush all routes if dev is linked to or unlinked from
|
||||
* an L3 master device (e.g., VRF)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (info->upper_dev && netif_is_l3_master(info->upper_dev))
|
||||
fib_disable_ip(dev, NETDEV_DOWN, true);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return NOTIFY_DONE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user