mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 04:18:39 +08:00
ALSA: firewire-lib: operate for period elapse event in process context
All of drivers in ALSA firewire stack processes two chances to process isochronous packets in any isochronous context; in software IRQ context for 1394 OHCI, and in process context of ALSA PCM application. In the process context, callbacks of .pointer and .ack are utilized. The callbacks are done by ALSA PCM core under acquiring lock of PCM substream, In design of ALSA PCM core, call of snd_pcm_period_elapsed() is used for drivers to awaken user processes from waiting for available frames. The function voluntarily acquires lock of PCM substream, therefore it is not called in the process context since it causes dead lock. As a workaround to avoid the dead lock, all of drivers in ALSA firewire stack uses workqueue to delegate the call. A variant of snd_pcm_period_elapsed() without lock acquisition can obsolete the workqueue. An extra care is needed for the callback of .pointer since it's called from snd_pcm_period_elapsed(). The isochronous context in Linux FireWire subsystem is safe mostly for nested call except in software IRQ context. Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210610031733.56297-3-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
47271b1b98
commit
7ba5ca32fe
@ -613,8 +613,16 @@ static void update_pcm_pointers(struct amdtp_stream *s,
|
||||
// The program in user process should periodically check the status of intermediate
|
||||
// buffer associated to PCM substream to process PCM frames in the buffer, instead
|
||||
// of receiving notification of period elapsed by poll wait.
|
||||
if (!pcm->runtime->no_period_wakeup)
|
||||
queue_work(system_highpri_wq, &s->period_work);
|
||||
if (!pcm->runtime->no_period_wakeup) {
|
||||
if (in_interrupt()) {
|
||||
// In software IRQ context for 1394 OHCI.
|
||||
snd_pcm_period_elapsed(pcm);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// In process context of ALSA PCM application under acquired lock of
|
||||
// PCM substream.
|
||||
snd_pcm_period_elapsed_under_stream_lock(pcm);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1740,22 +1748,11 @@ unsigned long amdtp_domain_stream_pcm_pointer(struct amdtp_domain *d,
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct amdtp_stream *irq_target = d->irq_target;
|
||||
|
||||
// Process isochronous packets queued till recent isochronous cycle to handle PCM frames.
|
||||
if (irq_target && amdtp_stream_running(irq_target)) {
|
||||
// This function is called in software IRQ context of
|
||||
// period_work or process context.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// When the software IRQ context was scheduled by software IRQ
|
||||
// context of IT contexts, queued packets were already handled.
|
||||
// Therefore, no need to flush the queue in buffer furthermore.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// When the process context reach here, some packets will be
|
||||
// already queued in the buffer. These packets should be handled
|
||||
// immediately to keep better granularity of PCM pointer.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Later, the process context will sometimes schedules software
|
||||
// IRQ context of the period_work. Then, no need to flush the
|
||||
// queue by the same reason as described in the above
|
||||
if (current_work() != &s->period_work)
|
||||
// In software IRQ context, the call causes dead-lock to disable the tasklet
|
||||
// synchronously.
|
||||
if (!in_interrupt())
|
||||
fw_iso_context_flush_completions(irq_target->context);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user