mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-23 20:24:12 +08:00
ptrace: Document that wait_task_inactive can't fail
After ptrace_freeze_traced succeeds it is known that the tracee has a __state value of __TASK_TRACED and that no __ptrace_unlink will happen because the tracer is waiting for the tracee, and the tracee is in ptrace_stop. The function ptrace_freeze_traced can succeed at any point after ptrace_stop has set TASK_TRACED and dropped siglock. The read_lock on tasklist_lock only excludes ptrace_attach. This means that the !current->ptrace which executes under a read_lock of tasklist_lock will never see a ptrace_freeze_trace as the tracer must have gone away before the tasklist_lock was taken and ptrace_attach can not occur until the read_lock is dropped. As ptrace_freeze_traced depends upon ptrace_attach running before it can run that excludes ptrace_freeze_traced until __state is set to TASK_RUNNING. This means that task_is_traced will fail in ptrace_freeze_attach and ptrace_freeze_attached will fail. On the current->ptrace branch of ptrace_stop which will be reached any time after ptrace_freeze_traced has succeed it is known that __state is __TASK_TRACED and schedule() will be called with that state. Use a WARN_ON_ONCE to document that wait_task_inactive(TASK_TRACED) should never fail. Remove the stale comment about may_ptrace_stop. Strictly speaking this is not true because if PREEMPT_RT is enabled wait_task_inactive can fail because __state can be changed. I don't see this as a problem as the ptrace code is currently broken on PREMPT_RT, and this is one of the issues. Failing and warning when the assumptions of the code are broken is good. Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220505182645.497868-8-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6a2d90ba02
commit
7b0fe1367e
@ -266,17 +266,9 @@ static int ptrace_check_attach(struct task_struct *child, bool ignore_state)
|
||||
}
|
||||
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!ret && !ignore_state) {
|
||||
if (!wait_task_inactive(child, __TASK_TRACED)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This can only happen if may_ptrace_stop() fails and
|
||||
* ptrace_stop() changes ->state back to TASK_RUNNING,
|
||||
* so we should not worry about leaking __TASK_TRACED.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
WARN_ON(READ_ONCE(child->__state) == __TASK_TRACED);
|
||||
ret = -ESRCH;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!ret && !ignore_state &&
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(!wait_task_inactive(child, __TASK_TRACED)))
|
||||
ret = -ESRCH;
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user