korg/linux
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git synced 2024-12-12 13:34:10 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

i2c: at91: fix write transfers by clearing pending interrupt first

Browse Source 
In some cases a NACK interrupt may be pending in the Status Register (SR)
as a result of a previous transfer. However at91_do_twi_transfer() did not
read the SR to clear pending interruptions before starting a new transfer.
Hence a NACK interrupt rose as soon as it was enabled again at the I2C
controller level, resulting in a wrong sequence of operations and strange
patterns of behaviour on the I2C bus, such as a clock stretch followed by
a restart of the transfer.

This first issue occurred with both DMA and PIO write transfers.

Also when a NACK error was detected during a PIO write transfer, the
interrupt handler used to wrongly start a new transfer by writing into the
Transmit Holding Register (THR). Then the I2C slave was likely to reply
with a second NACK.

This second issue is fixed in atmel_twi_interrupt() by handling the TXRDY
status bit only if both the TXCOMP and NACK status bits are cleared.

Tested with a at24 eeprom on sama5d36ek board running a linux-4.1-at91
kernel image. Adapted to linux-next.

Reported-by: Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se>
Signed-off-by: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Tested-by: Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Fixes: 93563a6a71 ("i2c: at91: fix a race condition when using the DMA controller")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #4.1
This commit is contained in:
Cyrille Pitchen 2015-10-21 15:44:03 +02:00 committed by Wolfram Sang
parent 319d7f05df
commit 6f6ddbb09d
1 changed files with 50 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

58
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
View File

@ -465,19 +465,57 @@ static irqreturn_t atmel_twi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
if (!irqstatus)
return IRQ_NONE;
else if (irqstatus & AT91_TWI_RXRDY)
at91_twi_read_next_byte(dev);
else if (irqstatus & AT91_TWI_TXRDY)
at91_twi_write_next_byte(dev);
/* catch error flags */
dev->transfer_status |= status;
/*
* When a NACK condition is detected, the I2C controller sets the NACK,
* TXCOMP and TXRDY bits all together in the Status Register (SR).
*
* 1 - Handling NACK errors with CPU write transfer.
*
* In such case, we should not write the next byte into the Transmit
* Holding Register (THR) otherwise the I2C controller would start a new
* transfer and the I2C slave is likely to reply by another NACK.
*
* 2 - Handling NACK errors with DMA write transfer.
*
* By setting the TXRDY bit in the SR, the I2C controller also triggers
* the DMA controller to write the next data into the THR. Then the
* result depends on the hardware version of the I2C controller.
*
* 2a - Without support of the Alternative Command mode.
*
* This is the worst case: the DMA controller is triggered to write the
* next data into the THR, hence starting a new transfer: the I2C slave
* is likely to reply by another NACK.
* Concurrently, this interrupt handler is likely to be called to manage
* the first NACK before the I2C controller detects the second NACK and
* sets once again the NACK bit into the SR.
* When handling the first NACK, this interrupt handler disables the I2C
* controller interruptions, especially the NACK interrupt.
* Hence, the NACK bit is pending into the SR. This is why we should
* read the SR to clear all pending interrupts at the beginning of
* at91_do_twi_transfer() before actually starting a new transfer.
*
* 2b - With support of the Alternative Command mode.
*
* When a NACK condition is detected, the I2C controller also locks the
* THR (and sets the LOCK bit in the SR): even though the DMA controller
* is triggered by the TXRDY bit to write the next data into the THR,
* this data actually won't go on the I2C bus hence a second NACK is not
* generated.
*/
if (irqstatus & (AT91_TWI_TXCOMP | AT91_TWI_NACK)) {
at91_disable_twi_interrupts(dev);
complete(&dev->cmd_complete);
} else if (irqstatus & AT91_TWI_RXRDY) {
at91_twi_read_next_byte(dev);
} else if (irqstatus & AT91_TWI_TXRDY) {
at91_twi_write_next_byte(dev);
}
/* catch error flags */
dev->transfer_status |= status;
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@ -487,6 +525,7 @@ static int at91_do_twi_transfer(struct at91_twi_dev *dev)
unsigned long time_left;
bool has_unre_flag = dev->pdata->has_unre_flag;
bool has_alt_cmd = dev->pdata->has_alt_cmd;
unsigned sr;
/*
* WARNING: the TXCOMP bit in the Status Register is NOT a clear on
@ -537,6 +576,9 @@ static int at91_do_twi_transfer(struct at91_twi_dev *dev)
reinit_completion(&dev->cmd_complete);
dev->transfer_status = 0;
/* Clear pending interrupts, such as NACK. */
sr = at91_twi_read(dev, AT91_TWI_SR);
if (dev->fifo_size) {
unsigned fifo_mr = at91_twi_read(dev, AT91_TWI_FMR);
@ -558,7 +600,7 @@ static int at91_do_twi_transfer(struct at91_twi_dev *dev)
} else if (dev->msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) {
unsigned start_flags = AT91_TWI_START;
if (at91_twi_read(dev, AT91_TWI_SR) & AT91_TWI_RXRDY) {
if (sr & AT91_TWI_RXRDY) {
dev_err(dev->dev, "RXRDY still set!");
at91_twi_read(dev, AT91_TWI_RHR);
}