Two fixes for x86:

- Unbreak stack dumps for inactive tasks by interpreting the special
     first frame left by __switch_to_asm() correctly. The recent change not
     to skip the first frame so ORC and frame unwinder behave in the same
     way caused all entries to be unreliable, i.e. prepended with '?'.
 
   - Use cpumask_available() instead of an implicit NULL check of a
     cpumask_var_t in mmio trace to prevent a Clang build warning
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQJHBAABCgAxFiEEQp8+kY+LLUocC4bMphj1TA10mKEFAl7KjZITHHRnbHhAbGlu
 dXRyb25peC5kZQAKCRCmGPVMDXSYofGED/9q61QWzA7WULpps2UA1JDa8JGvxwIl
 Z/juNskVAXWZRlBOACPD7mZNz3tkfHnl62igHIwUNlEddSANQ22c/7Yt74w+lCcD
 KtPVVx/zdnO2nt5HVekRT6D9pKfD8cfSF4X2k2/HF6u8hQGoqWGv2BVBuarNurWE
 3CIFtLbNvBhjI4WdzK7Y0IfcINSkcyABQn1+9Id8mwH8XOStl1aaIMY7hxlpj9e4
 mXoQtkbRXnTbv6Asw6Obb1F/7AtCdaDrNqfBCA0Juv4fJzPQOMgZSWEX6OtZny6E
 8vsDsSCYOY4wcGYH5CBJd3n48UOsrWbT+7yNLeAnE7ZaZzc0pdi0g2NVWUGuhYa3
 EbPzvj+kPgcVsfpfasts9KRAR57GNysKD8MLZGqaST9MAB7EKLbPWEDnhNnsAnU5
 3KNFEbfB16CyJmztlE2YCT6nNJ3rzaOtcDiRmJduf0Ib9PEEkPaaX85DfO0Yabnn
 QilGsYbkdux+UTQUtZg6+HPsikcKiN46hOLrSXXu1O+iMDxhL/mq/79hNrO9hffI
 idV+js2nxv9tC30MMczMdPuUX4nOHs26IMZObdV88gDMV9n9TGkW+XinoJBi/+er
 3xuDQw6aRqpolMmUVFhBLV0gYTB2+J0zc3eawa5c6U6B9avc4j4KxkNVIfrLiRkK
 3brABHq+di44MA==
 =COcb
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'x86-urgent-2020-05-24' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull x86 fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
 "Two fixes for x86:

   - Unbreak stack dumps for inactive tasks by interpreting the special
     first frame left by __switch_to_asm() correctly.

     The recent change not to skip the first frame so ORC and frame
     unwinder behave in the same way caused all entries to be
     unreliable, i.e. prepended with '?'.

   - Use cpumask_available() instead of an implicit NULL check of a
     cpumask_var_t in mmio trace to prevent a Clang build warning"

* tag 'x86-urgent-2020-05-24' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  x86/unwind/orc: Fix unwind_get_return_address_ptr() for inactive tasks
  x86/mmiotrace: Use cpumask_available() for cpumask_var_t variables
This commit is contained in:
Linus Torvalds 2020-05-24 10:21:02 -07:00
commit 667b6249b7
2 changed files with 9 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -320,12 +320,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unwind_get_return_address);
unsigned long *unwind_get_return_address_ptr(struct unwind_state *state)
{
struct task_struct *task = state->task;
if (unwind_done(state))
return NULL;
if (state->regs)
return &state->regs->ip;
if (task != current && state->sp == task->thread.sp) {
struct inactive_task_frame *frame = (void *)task->thread.sp;
return &frame->ret_addr;
}
if (state->sp)
return (unsigned long *)state->sp - 1;

View File

@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static void enter_uniprocessor(void)
int cpu;
int err;
if (downed_cpus == NULL &&
if (!cpumask_available(downed_cpus) &&
!alloc_cpumask_var(&downed_cpus, GFP_KERNEL)) {
pr_notice("Failed to allocate mask\n");
goto out;
@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static void leave_uniprocessor(void)
int cpu;
int err;
if (downed_cpus == NULL || cpumask_weight(downed_cpus) == 0)
if (!cpumask_available(downed_cpus) || cpumask_weight(downed_cpus) == 0)
return;
pr_notice("Re-enabling CPUs...\n");
for_each_cpu(cpu, downed_cpus) {