mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-24 20:54:10 +08:00
dlm: recover locks waiting for overlap replies
When recovery looks at locks waiting for replies, it fails to consider locks that have already received a reply for their first remote operation, but not received a reply for secondary, overlapping unlock/cancel. The appropriate stub reply needs to be called for these waiters. Appears when we start doing recovery in the presence of a many overlapping unlock/cancel ops. Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8a358ca8e7
commit
601342ce02
@ -3846,6 +3846,7 @@ static int waiter_needs_recovery(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb)
|
||||
void dlm_recover_waiters_pre(struct dlm_ls *ls)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct dlm_lkb *lkb, *safe;
|
||||
int wait_type, stub_unlock_result, stub_cancel_result;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&ls->ls_waiters_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3864,7 +3865,33 @@ void dlm_recover_waiters_pre(struct dlm_ls *ls)
|
||||
if (!waiter_needs_recovery(ls, lkb))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (lkb->lkb_wait_type) {
|
||||
wait_type = lkb->lkb_wait_type;
|
||||
stub_unlock_result = -DLM_EUNLOCK;
|
||||
stub_cancel_result = -DLM_ECANCEL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Main reply may have been received leaving a zero wait_type,
|
||||
but a reply for the overlapping op may not have been
|
||||
received. In that case we need to fake the appropriate
|
||||
reply for the overlap op. */
|
||||
|
||||
if (!wait_type) {
|
||||
if (is_overlap_cancel(lkb)) {
|
||||
wait_type = DLM_MSG_CANCEL;
|
||||
if (lkb->lkb_grmode == DLM_LOCK_IV)
|
||||
stub_cancel_result = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (is_overlap_unlock(lkb)) {
|
||||
wait_type = DLM_MSG_UNLOCK;
|
||||
if (lkb->lkb_grmode == DLM_LOCK_IV)
|
||||
stub_unlock_result = -ENOENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
log_debug(ls, "rwpre overlap %x %x %d %d %d",
|
||||
lkb->lkb_id, lkb->lkb_flags, wait_type,
|
||||
stub_cancel_result, stub_unlock_result);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
switch (wait_type) {
|
||||
|
||||
case DLM_MSG_REQUEST:
|
||||
lkb->lkb_flags |= DLM_IFL_RESEND;
|
||||
@ -3877,7 +3904,7 @@ void dlm_recover_waiters_pre(struct dlm_ls *ls)
|
||||
case DLM_MSG_UNLOCK:
|
||||
hold_lkb(lkb);
|
||||
ls->ls_stub_ms.m_type = DLM_MSG_UNLOCK_REPLY;
|
||||
ls->ls_stub_ms.m_result = -DLM_EUNLOCK;
|
||||
ls->ls_stub_ms.m_result = stub_unlock_result;
|
||||
ls->ls_stub_ms.m_flags = lkb->lkb_flags;
|
||||
_receive_unlock_reply(lkb, &ls->ls_stub_ms);
|
||||
dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
|
||||
@ -3886,15 +3913,15 @@ void dlm_recover_waiters_pre(struct dlm_ls *ls)
|
||||
case DLM_MSG_CANCEL:
|
||||
hold_lkb(lkb);
|
||||
ls->ls_stub_ms.m_type = DLM_MSG_CANCEL_REPLY;
|
||||
ls->ls_stub_ms.m_result = -DLM_ECANCEL;
|
||||
ls->ls_stub_ms.m_result = stub_cancel_result;
|
||||
ls->ls_stub_ms.m_flags = lkb->lkb_flags;
|
||||
_receive_cancel_reply(lkb, &ls->ls_stub_ms);
|
||||
dlm_put_lkb(lkb);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
default:
|
||||
log_error(ls, "invalid lkb wait_type %d",
|
||||
lkb->lkb_wait_type);
|
||||
log_error(ls, "invalid lkb wait_type %d %d",
|
||||
lkb->lkb_wait_type, wait_type);
|
||||
}
|
||||
schedule();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user