From 542694df7511977c3baa6ba855126a0cce883977 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kuninori Morimoto Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 09:58:32 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-core: rename soc_post_component_init() to soc_rtd_init() It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming, like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc. It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to debug. From function name point of view, "soc_post_component_init()" sounds like "component initialize function". But in reality it is rtd setup function. This patch renames soc_post_component_init() to soc_rtd_init() Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87v9uo7lc3.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- sound/soc/soc-core.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c index 0af83963289f..3c087b478398 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c @@ -1340,13 +1340,12 @@ err_probe: return ret; } -static void rtd_release(struct device *dev) +static void soc_rtd_release(struct device *dev) { kfree(dev); } -static int soc_post_component_init(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, - const char *name) +static int soc_rtd_init(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, const char *name) { int ret = 0; @@ -1355,7 +1354,7 @@ static int soc_post_component_init(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, if (!rtd->dev) return -ENOMEM; rtd->dev->parent = rtd->card->dev; - rtd->dev->release = rtd_release; + rtd->dev->release = soc_rtd_release; rtd->dev->groups = soc_dev_attr_groups; dev_set_name(rtd->dev, "%s", name); dev_set_drvdata(rtd->dev, rtd); @@ -1483,7 +1482,7 @@ static int soc_probe_link_dais(struct snd_soc_card *card, return ret; } - ret = soc_post_component_init(rtd, dai_link->name); + ret = soc_rtd_init(rtd, dai_link->name); if (ret) return ret;