mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 12:28:41 +08:00
esp_scsi: fix reset cleanup spinlock recursion
The esp_reset_cleanup() function is called with the host lock held and invokes starget_for_each_device() which wants to take it too. Here is a fix along the lines of shost_for_each_device()/__shost_for_each_device() adding a __starget_for_each_device() counterpart which assumes the lock has already been taken. Eventually, I think the driver should get modified so that more work is done as a softirq rather than in the interrupt context, but for now it fixes a bug that causes the spinlock debugger to fire. While at it, it fixes a small number of cosmetic problems with starget_for_each_device() too. Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
794e64d5e9
commit
522939d45c
@ -2026,8 +2026,8 @@ static void esp_reset_cleanup(struct esp *esp)
|
||||
tp->flags |= ESP_TGT_CHECK_NEGO;
|
||||
|
||||
if (tp->starget)
|
||||
starget_for_each_device(tp->starget, NULL,
|
||||
esp_clear_hold);
|
||||
__starget_for_each_device(tp->starget, NULL,
|
||||
esp_clear_hold);
|
||||
}
|
||||
esp->flags &= ~ESP_FLAG_RESETTING;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -896,11 +896,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__scsi_iterate_devices);
|
||||
* starget_for_each_device - helper to walk all devices of a target
|
||||
* @starget: target whose devices we want to iterate over.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This traverses over each devices of @shost. The devices have
|
||||
* This traverses over each device of @starget. The devices have
|
||||
* a reference that must be released by scsi_host_put when breaking
|
||||
* out of the loop.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void starget_for_each_device(struct scsi_target *starget, void * data,
|
||||
void starget_for_each_device(struct scsi_target *starget, void *data,
|
||||
void (*fn)(struct scsi_device *, void *))
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct Scsi_Host *shost = dev_to_shost(starget->dev.parent);
|
||||
@ -914,6 +914,33 @@ void starget_for_each_device(struct scsi_target *starget, void * data,
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(starget_for_each_device);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* __starget_for_each_device - helper to walk all devices of a target
|
||||
* (UNLOCKED)
|
||||
* @starget: target whose devices we want to iterate over.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This traverses over each device of @starget. It does _not_
|
||||
* take a reference on the scsi_device, so the whole loop must be
|
||||
* protected by shost->host_lock.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note: The only reason why drivers would want to use this is because
|
||||
* they need to access the device list in irq context. Otherwise you
|
||||
* really want to use starget_for_each_device instead.
|
||||
**/
|
||||
void __starget_for_each_device(struct scsi_target *starget, void *data,
|
||||
void (*fn)(struct scsi_device *, void *))
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct Scsi_Host *shost = dev_to_shost(starget->dev.parent);
|
||||
struct scsi_device *sdev;
|
||||
|
||||
__shost_for_each_device(sdev, shost) {
|
||||
if ((sdev->channel == starget->channel) &&
|
||||
(sdev->id == starget->id))
|
||||
fn(sdev, data);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__starget_for_each_device);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* __scsi_device_lookup_by_target - find a device given the target (UNLOCKED)
|
||||
* @starget: SCSI target pointer
|
||||
|
@ -242,6 +242,9 @@ extern struct scsi_device *__scsi_device_lookup_by_target(struct scsi_target *,
|
||||
uint);
|
||||
extern void starget_for_each_device(struct scsi_target *, void *,
|
||||
void (*fn)(struct scsi_device *, void *));
|
||||
extern void __starget_for_each_device(struct scsi_target *, void *,
|
||||
void (*fn)(struct scsi_device *,
|
||||
void *));
|
||||
|
||||
/* only exposed to implement shost_for_each_device */
|
||||
extern struct scsi_device *__scsi_iterate_devices(struct Scsi_Host *,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user