mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 21:38:32 +08:00
[CPUFREQ] Fix ondemand vs suspend deadlock
Rootcaused the bug to a deadlock in cpufreq and ondemand. Due to non-existent ordering between cpu_hotplug lock and dbs_mutex. Basically a race condition between cpu_down() and do_dbs_timer(). cpu_down() flow: * cpu_down() call for CPU 1 * Takes hot plug lock * Calls pre down notifier * cpufreq notifier handler calls cpufreq_driver_target() which takes cpu_hotplug lock again. OK as cpu_hotplug lock is recursive in same process context * CPU 1 goes down * Calls post down notifier * cpufreq notifier handler calls ondemand event stop which takes dbs_mutex So, cpu_hotplug lock is taken before dbs_mutex in this flow. do_dbs_timer is triggerred by a periodic timer event. It first takes dbs_mutex and then takes cpu_hotplug lock in cpufreq_driver_target(). Note the reverse order here compared to above. So, if this timer event happens at right moment during cpu_down, system will deadlok. Attached patch fixes the issue for both ondemand and conservative. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9ed059e155
commit
4ec223d02f
@ -72,6 +72,14 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_dbs_info_s, cpu_dbs_info);
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned int dbs_enable; /* number of CPUs using this policy */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* DEADLOCK ALERT! There is a ordering requirement between cpu_hotplug
|
||||
* lock and dbs_mutex. cpu_hotplug lock should always be held before
|
||||
* dbs_mutex. If any function that can potentially take cpu_hotplug lock
|
||||
* (like __cpufreq_driver_target()) is being called with dbs_mutex taken, then
|
||||
* cpu_hotplug lock should be taken before that. Note that cpu_hotplug lock
|
||||
* is recursive for the same process. -Venki
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static DEFINE_MUTEX (dbs_mutex);
|
||||
static DECLARE_WORK (dbs_work, do_dbs_timer, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -414,12 +422,14 @@ static void dbs_check_cpu(int cpu)
|
||||
static void do_dbs_timer(void *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
lock_cpu_hotplug();
|
||||
mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
|
||||
for_each_online_cpu(i)
|
||||
dbs_check_cpu(i);
|
||||
schedule_delayed_work(&dbs_work,
|
||||
usecs_to_jiffies(dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_rate));
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dbs_mutex);
|
||||
unlock_cpu_hotplug();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void dbs_timer_init(void)
|
||||
@ -514,6 +524,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS:
|
||||
lock_cpu_hotplug();
|
||||
mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
|
||||
if (policy->max < this_dbs_info->cur_policy->cur)
|
||||
__cpufreq_driver_target(
|
||||
@ -524,6 +535,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
|
||||
this_dbs_info->cur_policy,
|
||||
policy->min, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dbs_mutex);
|
||||
unlock_cpu_hotplug();
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
@ -71,6 +71,14 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_dbs_info_s, cpu_dbs_info);
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned int dbs_enable; /* number of CPUs using this policy */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* DEADLOCK ALERT! There is a ordering requirement between cpu_hotplug
|
||||
* lock and dbs_mutex. cpu_hotplug lock should always be held before
|
||||
* dbs_mutex. If any function that can potentially take cpu_hotplug lock
|
||||
* (like __cpufreq_driver_target()) is being called with dbs_mutex taken, then
|
||||
* cpu_hotplug lock should be taken before that. Note that cpu_hotplug lock
|
||||
* is recursive for the same process. -Venki
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static DEFINE_MUTEX (dbs_mutex);
|
||||
static DECLARE_WORK (dbs_work, do_dbs_timer, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -363,12 +371,14 @@ static void dbs_check_cpu(int cpu)
|
||||
static void do_dbs_timer(void *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
lock_cpu_hotplug();
|
||||
mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
|
||||
for_each_online_cpu(i)
|
||||
dbs_check_cpu(i);
|
||||
queue_delayed_work(dbs_workq, &dbs_work,
|
||||
usecs_to_jiffies(dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_rate));
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dbs_mutex);
|
||||
unlock_cpu_hotplug();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void dbs_timer_init(void)
|
||||
@ -469,6 +479,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS:
|
||||
lock_cpu_hotplug();
|
||||
mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
|
||||
if (policy->max < this_dbs_info->cur_policy->cur)
|
||||
__cpufreq_driver_target(
|
||||
@ -479,6 +490,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
|
||||
this_dbs_info->cur_policy,
|
||||
policy->min, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dbs_mutex);
|
||||
unlock_cpu_hotplug();
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user